From: Xela@yabbs
To: pixy@yabbs
Subject: ok d00d, pt. 2
Date: Mon Jun 20 02:26:34 1994
"...if all the forces in the world were balanced, there would be no
progress or change..."
Time for a little physics lecture, I think. If you take a point charge at
one particular equipotential, say +10V, and move it to an equipotential,
say +5V, you've created an "imbalance" in the equation; you have to
perform work to move that point charge to resolve the imbalance. But if
you move that charge at +5 back to +10, your *net* work done is zero. The
slate is wiped clean. In order to facilitate my point, I'll expand the
world to mean the universe.
In the universe, the total amount of energy is a constant; if you change
gas into mechanical potential [i.e. your car], you don't get all the
energy stored in the hydrocarbon molecule: you get say 20% and the rest is
converted into heat, sound, etc. energy...but if you add up all the
percentages of all the conversions, you get the original energy back.
None is lost, it is converted.
If it were lost, you would have your "disequilibrium" and the law of
conservation of energy wouldn't hold [perpetual motion machines would be
possible].
Let's look at thermodynamics and more specifically entropy, to further my
point. The universe, as current theory holds, is running towards a heat
death; entropy seeks order and order seeks entropy until the two converge
at zero. The universe, as a whole, has "entropy + order = 0" to work
with. Locally, on planet Earth, we are fortunate enough to be a local
concentration of ordered energy. This allows us to convert our higher
forms of energy into heat + consumer products [moving cars, the cars
themselves, etc.]. But taking the entire universe into consideration, we
are an anomaly at best, with our pocket of order being turned into heat
energy, the lowest form of energy.
So to make my point, change on our planet is possible, because we have
ordered energy with which to convert into other things + heat. But the
balance remains; we cannot add energy to the equation...
"We are defined by the adversity and imperfection of life, and the limits
it puts on us."
I believe that we define ourselves and our concepts of life, and not the
other way around. To do so implies a higher being.
X
|