From: pixy@yabbs
To: xela @yabbs
Subject: nature
Date: Sat Jun 18 02:47:41 1994

Okay dumbfuck, let's talk reality here and see if any of my ideas sink
below the lead walls you call your skull. 

You made the humiliating error of agreeing with natalie about peae coming
through anarchy. *now listen this time!!!* The world, no matter what kind
of political or economic system runs it, is in a state of disequilibrium. 

Here we go nice and slow to explain that last statement: The world has
limited resources. All animals have basic needs and desires, much more
than the world can satisfy. This creates an unbalance that cause
competition and killing and fighting and all the other things that make
the world tick. If all the forces in the world were balanced, there would
be no progress or change. We are defined by the adversity and imperfection
of life, and the limits it puts on us. 

This arguement really founds itself on the fact that we both have
different connations attached to the word peace. The above is how i see
the world. By the way i define peace, i see that there is none inherent in
human nature or any other nature. You see it a different way, fine. Let me
hear it. But I'll be much more receptive if you drop the bullshit insults.
I await an intelligent reply--hopefully, 
pixy