From: Xela@yabbs
To: arachnoi@yabbs
Subject: Foot in your mouth, again?
Date: Fri Jun 17 00:48:04 1994

{Skippy!...

Spiderman! *shrug*

...this sounds like u!...

Well, most folks would have said the quote fit you better, since you have 
this preconceived notion in your head that you are always right.  Go 
figure. *shrug*

...BTW didn't Hitler also paraphrase your original post?  That meant the 
old rich, mainly jewish bankers, blah blah...}

So now I'm an anti-Semite?  Boy are you out of line.  You better back your 
claim up, or you'll lose even more credibility [as if you have any left to 
lose].

{BTW get a real account.  BBS accounts are lame at best.  They are for 
housewives and H.S. students}

Once again I am happy to say that you have put your foot into your mouth 
.  If you have the 191 I.Q. you claim you have, you'd have done at least 
some half-rate research.  But I guess I can't expect that from a dumbass 
like you, anyway. *shrug*  Oh well, next topic. 

Seriously, do some research.  I have another real account I use 
infrequently.

{I guess it's your inability to understand that's lacking...}

You sure guess quite a bit for someone as smug as yourself.  If you *know* 
that I don't understand something, quit saying that you guess I don't 
understand anything, and *tell* me what I don't understand.  Otherwise we 
are just exchanging worthless hot air.

{I did a little, but u didn't catch it...}

I probably missed it (assuming I did) because you also claimed that "such 
a constant doesn't matter since it factors out of everything."  To 
'loosely' paraphrase your messages.

{Everybody can't have something for nothing all the time.  There have to 
be producers... I'd tell you more, but...}

But what?  It's called Prisoner's Dilemma.  Heard of that?  It's where 
some statisical element of the population takes advantage of a public good 
at the expense of the whole.  Basic game theory explores the economic 
features of the equilibriums [of certain variables, like capital, goods 
produced, etc.] which result from the selfish taking advantage of an 
altruistic system.  It's covered even in behavioral biology; Dawkins even 
covers ESSes in his books.  You really insult yourself when you assume I 
know nothing; you really do.

I'd tell you more, but it looks like you've got a bit of reading to cattch 
up on [catcch = catch].

Later Spidey.

X