#: 10283 S10/OS9/6809 (CoCo)
15-Apr-91 17:52:18
Sb: #10239-#hard drive format
Fm: Lee Veal 74726,1752
To: Hugo Bueno 71211,3662 (X)
Here are the parameters that I use for my B&B setup:
dmode /hx
drv=01 stp=03 typ=80 dns=02 cyl=0267 sid=04
vfy=00 sct=0022 tos=0022 ilv=16 sas=10
...which is a 20MB Miniscribe
dmode /hd
drv=00 stp=03 typ=80 dns=02 cyl=0354 sid=06
vfy=00 sct=0022 tos=0022 ilv=16 sas=10
..which is a 40MB Miniscribe
Note that the SCT= and TOS= parameters are both set to 0022 instead of 0020
like yours (and mine used to be). I read a spec on drive capacities and it said
thrt the Sectors per track (IBM-sized; 512 bytes) was 17. I said, "Hmmmm, if
you can get 17 of the 512-byte sectors on a track, then you should be able to
get 34 of our (OS-9's) 256-byte sectors.
Calculations for 20MB Miniscribe Drive
Cylinders Heads Sec/Trk Sec. Sz
615 x 4 x 32 x 256 = 20,152,320
615 x 4 x 34 x 256 = 21,411,840
Extra= 1,259,520
----------
Calculations for 40MB Miniscribe Drive
Cylinders Heads Sec/Trk Sec. Sz
852 x 6 x 32 x 256 = 41,877,504
852 x 6 x 34 x 256 = 44,494,848
Extra= 2,617,344
The specs for the 40MB Miniscribe drive was somewhat less than 852.
I noticed the highest cylinder that the specs listed as formattable
was quite a distance from the "landing zone" (park track). It did not
take a brilliant deduction but I figured that the space between the
park track and the highest track was usable. So, I modified my
descriptor to format it, too. It formatted fine, and I've been using
that space (and the 2 extra OS-9 sectors per track) nor about a year.
It turned out that using the documented high track made the calculations
come out to a size that more closely matched what a typical 40MB hard
drive was supposed to be on an IBM or clone system. OS-9 WINS AGAIN!!!!
Try it out.
Lee
There is 1 Reply.
|