From: Zbadba@yabbs
To: feotus@yabbs
Subject: re: once again
Date: Sat Jun 11 22:28:26 1994

re: "Why is the majority of anrachy based on reactionary atheism" etc

Interesting. 
I guess I must not fit with the "majority of anarchy" then.

My guess is that the "majority of anarchy" (as you see it) is an
extreme, in its own way similar to puritanism: the rejection/denial of 
instinct. The only difference is that instead of worshipping a diety (as a 
concrete idea), "they" deify logic. Vis-a-vis "reactionary atheism."

Don't get me wrong. I'm neither puritan nor atheist. I'm really an 
agnostic, in the sense of the word that I believe that it is impossible to 
know or verify the existence of any higher power, but at the same time, it 
is impossible to deny the possibility that higher power(s) may exist. Thus 
I waste little time on theological debate.

I don't consider myself a die-hard anarchist (or a die-hard anything, for 
that matter), because I recognise that history is cyclical, and 
ultimately, any system will fall.

I'm more in favor of anarchy mainly because it's quicker. No mucking about 
with a power structure. Just let things fall as they may. Dadaist 
government.

babble babble babble.

Z.