TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: yabbs.anarchy
to: ALL
from: JasonLee@yabbs
date: 1994-05-11 20:16:36
subject: re: Singapore reply

From: JasonLee@yabbs
To: robtelee@yabbs
Subject: re: Singapore reply
Date: Wed May 11 20:16:36 1994

In message re: Singapore reply, robtelee said:
> You, sir, are correct in your statements regarding Jim Crow.  In the early 
> part of this century, certain people were excluded from voting because 
> they may support the "wrong" candidate.  These sanctions took the forms of 
> literacy tests and poll taxes.  The Supreme Court overturned these 
> oppresive measures.  Now, with certain resrictions, just about anyone can 
> vote in this country.  The candidates we have to choose from is the price 
> we pay for a free electorate.

I always thought the thing we should do is this (suggested by Jello Biafra):
Have a "None of the Above" candidate on the ballot.  If this person wins,
then you have to hold a new election with all new candidates.  Why not?  The
problem with that is, who rules in the meantime?
Another thing that would help is to force the media to adhere to the equal
time laws.  They seem to be generally discarded in order to show the two
main candidates (dems and reps).

JasonLee

SOURCE: yabbs via textfiles.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.