#: 8920 S12/OS9/68000 (OSK)
27-Dec-90 23:53:42
Sb: #8919-#68000 ASM Language
Fm: Jack Crenshaw 72325,1327
To: Jack Crenshaw 72325,1327 (X)
[Continued]
The first decision is: Do I keep the conventional format (label, mnemonic,
operands) ... in other words, try to remain as faithful to convention as
possible, or do I go for the A=B approach?
The next decision is: How to handle all the addressing modes, sizes, etc.
Either way I go, I obviously have to allow for the generation of any
instruction that the normal assembler provides.
The size parameters give me fits, too. I'm sorta toying with the idea of a
size declaration. In other words, you could declare D0, say, to be size byte.
From then on, until you redeclare it, every reference to D0 would produce a
byte instruction. Saves all the '.B's.
[More]
There is 1 Reply.
|