From: MAX                 
To: SNAKEBYTE           
Subject: Moral/Popular  
Date & Time: 07/29/90 13:16:10
Message Number  6940

That fad is a homosexual variant of one that heterosexual females have
been doing, too.  Yes, it's perverse, but it's equally perverse whether
the person doing it is straight, gay, or bisexual, isn't it?  If
bringing this up is meant to suggest that all homosexuals are 'perverse'
in this fashion because of this fad, then logically all heterosexuals
are perverse because some of them do it, too.  Yes, it's sick.
    My point is, again, that what you describe has a victim -- in this
case, the mouse.  If you take what most people would consider a normal
heterosexual relationship and do not change it in any way other than
flipping the sex of one of the people involved, you haven't made it into
a stinking morass of child molesting, animal-raping human slime.
    At any rate, there is NO EVIDENCE to support that a homosexual or
bisexual individual is more predisposed to molesting children, raping
other individuals, or, yes, sticking small furry animals in body
cavities than a heterosexual one is.  There is, indeed, evidence to
support that homo/bi people are likely to be more promiscuous than
heteros.  I consider this unfortunate at best (and dangerous at worst),
but my moral judgment on the matter comes from the promiscuity, not the
sexual orientation.