ED>TO>ED>       Yah, but the Mage isn't going to win in a toe to toe fight with
ED>TO>ED>WH.  And besides, if the Mage casts slow on the WH/Warrior, that would
ED>TO>ED>cut back on the damage abit.  Besides, about it being "awesome", it
ED>TO>ED>already is awe inspiring, with the 200+ damage it can do.  They didn't
ED>TO>ED>need to make it immune to Mres too.
ED>TO>       I would think a High level witchunter would resist Speed, and as
ED>TO>soon as the frenzy/sped bug is fixed, Mages wont be as powerful in PvP.
ED>       Yah, but they still have slow, which takes (I believe) a swing
ED>off of each round.  That's a decent decrease in damage, and that's not
ED>counting spells like confusion and such that the Mage can cast too.
ED>About WH's against Mages (and every other magic-3 class), I'd think the
ED>WH *should* win, because that's what the classes focus is.
       Most people dont build there witchunters to fight mainly against
these chars  So
they wont resist those kinds of spells 
but if you were in a war, for say, against a mage youd want to raise
wisdom just to defeat this mage, It all evens out how you play your
cards.
---
Sent via MailLink, 23-JUL-97, 16:15:02, from:
(BNK)The Boink Board - Telnet to BOINK.NET