JH>JO>DE>Don't give me this "Witchunters are elite warriors" crap either.  Its
JH>JO>DE>all pretty fair.  Witchunters just need more MagicRes.
JH>JO>DE>Witchunter beats up mage.
JH>JO>DE>Warrior can't beat up mage so well.
JH>JO>DE>Warrior beats up witchunter.
JH>JO>DE>Ever hear of balance?
JH>JO>DE>---
JH>JO>Witchunters cannot beat mages and other spellcasters so its more like
JH>JO>this
JH>JO>Mage beats Witchunter
JH>JO>Mage beats warrior
JH>JO>Warrior beats witchunter
JH>JO>even hear of unbalance
JH>JO>Spanky
JH>JO>Level 30 Witchunter
JH>Actually... a decently played witchunter should be able to beat a mage.
JH>Okay.. so a mage Dfirs for average 160 per round (which is mighty good
JH>already), A comparable witchy should be able to do 160 per round also.
JH>And they've got a heck of a lot more HPs.  It'll be a close one, but I
JH>think overall, a witchunter-vs-mage match would show the witchy to be
JH>the victor more often.
JH>#8) Joe
JH>---
JH>Sent via MailLink, 23-JUL-97, 02:07:38, from:
JH>(ABB)Ace BBS - ace.net.au
JH>Goodwood, South Australia
Nod correct, I find witchunters harder to beat, but I still win :) by
say less than 20 hp.  A mage doing an average of 160 dfir?? u will only
see a lvl 40 mage doing that sort of average..by then a witchunter would
be lvl 50..so comparing witchunters and mages..dont just look at
pvp..witchunters lvl much faster than mages..thus has lvl advantage
-Arcane lvl 31 mage
---
Sent via MailLink, 23-JUL-97, 20:27:22, from:
(G-U)Game Universe - 61 3 95837409
Melbourne, Australia