DA>JH>Actually... a decently played witchunter should be able to beat a mage.
DA>JH>Okay.. so a mage Dfirs for average 160 per round (which is mighty good
DA>JH>already), A comparable witchy should be able to do 160 per round also.
DA>JH>And they've got a heck of a lot more HPs.  It'll be a close one, but I
DA>JH>think overall, a witchunter-vs-mage match would show the witchy to be
DA>JH>the victor more often.
DA>       Obviously you have never played a Witchunter.  I am level 41,
DA>with 100 int, str, agil, health and 53 charm.  I swing 5/5/6 with
DA>manticore tail with 16% crits and 95% accuracy in the crystal tunnels.
DA>However, on AVERAGE, I do 125 pts per round.  Average means some rounds
DA>higher, some rounds lower... but, thats STILL a FAR cry from this 160
DA>pts per round you say whr's can get...  maybe at level 50 or something,
DA>but not at any NORMAL level.
True.. I have never played a witchunter, but I certainly have seen Level
35+ witchunters doing an average of 160 during a PvP match against a
L40 mage.  Maybe he was just lucky that day...
#8) Joe
---
Sent via MailLink, 24-JUL-97, 00:20:18, from:
(ABB)Ace BBS - ace.net.au
Goodwood, South Australia