JH>JO>DE>Don't give me this "Witchunters are elite warriors" crap either.  Its
JH>JO>DE>all pretty fair.  Witchunters just need more MagicRes.
JH>JO>DE>Witchunter beats up mage.
JH>JO>DE>Warrior can't beat up mage so well.
JH>JO>DE>Warrior beats up witchunter.
JH>JO>DE>Ever hear of balance?
JH>JO>DE>---
JH>JO>Witchunters cannot beat mages and other spellcasters so its more like
JH>JO>this
JH>JO>Mage beats Witchunter
JH>JO>Mage beats warrior
JH>JO>Warrior beats witchunter
JH>JO>even hear of unbalance
JH>JO>Spanky
JH>JO>Level 30 Witchunter
JH>Actually... a decently played witchunter should be able to beat a mage.
JH>Okay.. so a mage Dfirs for average 160 per round (which is mighty good
JH>already), A comparable witchy should be able to do 160 per round also.
JH>And they've got a heck of a lot more HPs.  It'll be a close one, but I
JH>think overall, a witchunter-vs-mage match would show the witchy to be
JH>the victor more often.
JH>#8) Joe
It all depends on the player and the equpiment and stuff... Every PvP
fight should be different...  Ya gotta think of the exp too, half-ogre
witchunter is what around 155% exp or somethin, and a elf mage is around
165%...  so with that 10% in
there a mage should be a level or two over the witchunter... you cant
compare level-to-level, a level 10 witchunter can destroy a level 10
mage, but a level 35 witchunter and a level 35 mage would all be based
on the player and how they chose their stats..
---
Sent via MailLink, 22-JUL-97, 15:47:28, from:
(CUP)Cupid's BBS - CUPID.COM
Virginia's Largest BBS