TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: cis.os9.68000.osk
to: Bob Palmer 74646,2156 (X)
from: Zack Sessions 71532,1555
date: 1993-08-09 18:29:50
subject: #18517-#to cio or not to cio?

#: 18522 S12/OS9/68000 (OSK)
    09-Aug-93  18:29:50
Sb: #18517-#to cio or not to cio?
Fm: Zack Sessions 71532,1555
To: Bob Palmer 74646,2156 (X)

Interesting comments. I had no idea that there would be so many 2.3 users out
there who never upgraded. And I also didn't know the TC70 was currently limited
to 2.3. Actually, most of the OSK software I have produced and plan to produce
depends on the MM/1 with its graphics interface, KWindows. I understand
KWindows worked on the TC70 at one time, do you have it?

On the cio issue, I think there are two options for developers. One is to
distribute both cio and non-cio versions of the software. The other is to
distribute the product as either a library or a group of ROFs and do a l68 as
part of the installation. This is actually the recommended method of
distributing software for VMS systems.

------------------------------------
 Zack C Sessions
 ColorSystems

 via InfoXpress/OSK by Bill Dickhaus

There are 2 Replies.

SOURCE: compuserve via textfiles.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.