GO>DA> No, I don't want no damn BARBARIAN... sheeeesh, I would go from a
GO>DA>130% table to a 250% like that with NOTHING to show for, except
GO>DA>Experience 110,xxx,xxx ... For next level 225,xxx,xxx
GO>DA>No Thanks.
GO>DA>The 'no magic items' is NOT a dumb restriction, they just need to add a
GO>DA>FEW more decent NON magical items and all will be fine.
GO>DA>- Daytona
GO>Non-magical items arent supposed to be decent. Magical, is better than
GO>non-magical. What i think should be done, is maybe give witchunters a
GO>bonus when attacking magic-users. That'll give
GO>the class a bit more originality. Personally, i think it should be that
GO>witchunters can just beat the hell outta a mage, but thats just not so.
well witchies do get a bonus vs mages/magical creatures. They resist
their spells more often(except for dfir).
---
Sent via MailLink, 21-JUL-97, 20:22:08, from:
(STG)[0;1;35m StarGate OnLine [0;1;37m- [0;1;36m(215)-728-4933
[0;1;33m"The Gate To The OnLine World!"[0;1m
|