DE>NI>IB>man, until y'all have played a witchunter for yerselves, just shut the
DE>NI>IB>bumblefuck up already! witchunters rule, always have, always will,
DE>NI>Is that why a lv 42 warrior on our board constantly beat the crap out of
DE>NI>a lv 44 witchunter some months ago?
DE>Did it ever occur to you that this is the way it should be? If
DE>witchunters could slay warriors, that would make them a god class,
DE>because with their fierce MagicRes, they can do well against
DE>spellcasters already.
DE>Don't give me this "Witchunters are elite warriors" crap either. Its
DE>all pretty fair. Witchunters just need more MagicRes.
DE>Witchunter beats up mage.
DE>Warrior can't beat up mage so well.
DE>Warrior beats up witchunter.
DE>Ever hear of balance?
DE>---
DE>Sent via MailLink, 20-JUL-97, 22:38:22, from:
DE>(ISS)Infinite Space Online Network - 407-856-0021
DE>Orlando, Florida - Telnet to
witchunters are elite i can take a lvl 21 warrior with my 22 mage and he
only has 4 less hps he uses a dragontooth trident and i whip out my
manticore tail then i kick his ass with my 7 pieces of eq and 47/3
ac@!!@#!@#
---
Sent via MailLink, 22-JUL-97, 01:46:24, from:
(CS1)CSI Online Services - Beachwood, NJ
Modem: 908-473-2860 Telnet: bbs.csionline.com[0;1m
|