GA>GA>IN>2. The Camaro is faster. We all know that.
GA>GA>By 1 second; and much less economical.
GA>$5,700 to be exact.  Is 1 second shaved off the 0-60 time worth $5,700
GA>to you Inferno?  Man, I keep leaving things out.  In addition to
GA>insurance and the premium fuel thing which Kid Z pointed out, I also
GA>forgot maintenance.  How much higher do you think will maintenance be
GA>for a Z28 than an Integra?  With all this new info, it sounds like the
GA>cost would be closer to $15,000  than $10 -- enough to
GA>buy a Civic to go with your Integra.  Either that or a 2-year old Z28,
GA>knowing how fast their resale value drops.  heh cool, double hit :)
GA>GA>By the way, since you've forgotten, this argument was only supposed to
GA>GA>be about how much more the Camaro would cost to own over an 8-year
GA>GA>period of time, and I've already won.  It already pushes $10,000 easy.
GA>Just so you know Inf, I'm only rubbing this in your face because you're
GA>acting like such a schmuck right now.  And because this is exactly how
GA>you talked to me when you thought you had the upper hand.  So for the
GA>fifth time, admit it.
GA>---
GA>Sent via MailLink, 09-JUL-97, 13:30:44, from:
GA>(URB)Urbanite BBS - 415-528-6602
GA>Los Altos, Ca. U.S.A
I don't know what you're thinking about the VTEC,  but just like any
other high performance 4 cyl (I've owned 2 and driven another a lot),
then I'm sure it'd run on nothing less than supreme. Not without severe
knocking anyway.  These high performance 4 cylinders have high
compression ratios.
---
Sent via MailLink, 09-JUL-97, 22:38:40, from:
(WCC)Dreamscape BBS - dsoe.com
Vancouver, BC