IN>sort of other point that escapes all of us. As for "exposing" me give me
IN>a break. I'm approved for financing on cars you wouldn't be allowed to
IN>test drive. Now back to the REAL argument that you so hope to avoid.
Yes, EXPOSING.  Before he EXPOSED you, you were hiding behind your
keyboard insulting my car.  Then I asked you 3 times what you drove but
you were too embarassed to answer.
You're the one avoiding the argument; that's why you don't respond to
some of my messages and the rest you change the subject or try to squirm
to fit in a smartass comeback comment whenever you can.
IN>1. The Camaro is cheaper, as shown through MSRP prices I gave you.
Yeah, by about $50 bucks.
IN>2. The Camaro is faster. We all know that.
By a second; and much less economical.
IN>3. The Camaro's skidpad is higher, so it also corners better at high
IN>speeds.
What's that compared to how the handling feels?
IN>4. The Camaro's resale value is pretty much on scale with the Integra. I
IN>looked up resale values, you didn't, you made them up.
Wrong, I had about 7 entries from each one to compare with, you just had
one.
IN>5. The Camaro, from what I can tell, outsells the Integra. But that's
IN>not based on fact.
No it isn't.
IN>6. If you're concerned about mileage go buy a slow car.
Like yours?  That's only what close-minded people like you do.  I'm
willing to pay a small sacrifice in mileage for much improved
performance.
By the way, since you've forgotten, this argument was only supposed to
be about how much more the Camaro would cost to own over an 8-year
period of time, and I've already won.  It already pushes $10,000 easy.
---
Sent via MailLink, 09-JUL-97, 13:19:02, from:
(URB)Urbanite BBS - 415-528-6602
Los Altos, Ca. U.S.A