#: 12379 S10/OS9/6809 (CoCo)
    23-Sep-91  02:14:22
Sb: #ACIAPAK patch vs. SACIA
Fm: Erich Schulman 75140,3175
To: ALL

Which is re likely to improve my /t2's performance:
      a.) Patching ACIAPAK so as to increase its buffer size, or
      b.) Intalling SACIA drivers in place of ACIAPAK? I have the ACIAPAK patch
and the SACIA drivers all ready.  I just need to know which would more likely
be a better long-term solution.  Since I've been td that SACIA's xmode can't be
used with /t1 and /p, can I continue using the regular xmode command with them?
If not, is there any way I can retain ACIAPAK with SACIA without having to
create a special boot disk just for SACIA?  If the ACIAPAK patch would work
better, what is the biggest buffer size one ought use (assuming I figure out
how to modify the patch as per my download)?

There are 2 Replies.