A>IN>Ask anyone who's driven an Integra (or better yet raced on) vs. a
GA>IN>Camaro. There is no comparison. The Integra is slow, plain and simple,
GA>There is very much a comparison.  They both handle well, only the
GA>Integra is light and agile and I and many others happen to like those
GA>kinds of cars as opposed to a heavy, bulky Camaro.  0-60 in 7 seconds,
GA>or 6.5 with the Type-R, IS fast, especially for a 4-cylinder, which is
GA>one 4-cylinder that kicks the crap out of its any pathetic loser
GA>American 4-cylinder, especially its INDENDED Chevy competitor, the Z24.
GA>For a 5.7 V8, I'd say the Camaro is slow.  It might have less low-end
GA>grunt, but it has more excitement when you rev it and the RPMs climb.
GA>I thought you said you liked imports.  You sure don't act like it.
GA>---
GA>Sent via MailLink, 04-JUL-97, 15:41:14, from:
GA>(URB)Urbanite BBS - 415-528-6602
GA>Los Altos, Ca. U.S.A
Yes, compared to racing versions of the Camaro, the street stock version
IS slow. It's kept mild for mileage reasons, seeing as it pretty much
has the same mileage and same numbers of import cars three times the
price. Add 2000 in mods and you're running in the 12's.
---
Sent via MailLink, 07-JUL-97, 10:11:20, from:
(WCC)Dreamscape BBS - dsoe.com
Vancouver, BC