Hello Roger!

Oct 13 04:58 03, Roger Scudder wrote to Bo Simonsen:

 >> It's written in C now, but I can't make of my mind if I shall use C++ 
 >> for some of it.. Because it's not my oppinion that C++ applications is 
 >> working far as good as C applications under Linux..

 RS>  I can't see why not.  It sounds like you may be splitting hairs over 
 RS> an assumption...  now, are you going to tell me what this part you 
 RS> are referring to is, or does?  ;-)

Well I can't make up my mind about it. It's because we are working with C++
in school, and I see there that C++ has some smart way of doing things..
But anyway the code works perfectly in C, so I doubt that I'll change it ;)

 >>  >>  >> In someway I like Borland C++ too, maybe
because I'm forced to 
 >>  >>  >> use it (They are only having that at my school).

 >>  RS>  Seriously, though...  I used Turbo C++ for several years.  It was 
 >>  RS> my 

 >> It's not Turbo C++, it's Borland C++ (Windows based).

 RS>  I have used Borland C++ version 3.1 and it is very similar to Turbo 
 RS> C++ for DOS with the obvious difference being the Windows development 
 RS> tools.

Okay, I've never done Turbo C++... 

Regards,
Bo

--- Msged/LNX 6.1.2 (Linux/2.4.22-1-586tsc (i586))