From: "Gary Britt" 

I suspect your suspicions are completely and totally wrong, as usual.

Gary

"Phil Payne"  wrote in
message news:4398c782$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
> news:4398c1f3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > But the ratification was conditional.  One of the conditions was, it
> doesn't
> > apply except to the extent of enabling legislation passed by Congress.
>
> Yes it does.  Congress is utterly irrelevant because of the High
Contracting
> Party. Check out the flags at
>
http://untreaty.un.org/ENGLISH/bible/englishinternetbible/partI/chapterIV/treat
y14.asp -
> there aren't any.  Ratified is ratified.
>
> Note 11 -
>
http://untreaty.un.org/ENGLISH/bible/englishinternetbible/partI/chapterIV/treat
y14.asp#N11
> for the terminally obtuse - doesn't mention or imply any relevance of
> Congress.
>
> In fact, the reference to the US Constitution broadens rather than narrows
> the scope.
>
> I suspect Gonzales read this for the first time either yesterday or the
day
> before.  And crapped his pants.
>
> --
>   Phil Payne
>   http://www.isham-research.co.uk
>   +44 7833 654 800
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5