Gordon Lewicky wrote to Bob Seaborn on Saturday June 05 2004 at 05:21:

 GL> At any rate, there are always 2 sides to any story as well as those
 GL> who prefer to believe what they wish and not what was. However
 GL> there is enough documentation scattered throughout the net to support
 GL> the fact that Ward went to war and wanted the IC seat.

I don't think that was ever in doubt, Gordon. The critical point, however,
is whether Ward actually organized a ZCC _vote_ to remove Bob Satti as IC.
I mean a formal vote, like this time, not merely that Bob was put under
pressure to resign.

According to my admittedly not first-hand information, he did not. Nor did
anyone else.

If he had, I would have expected Janis to point this out in every echo,
since it would totally undercut Ward's argument that the ZCC vote on his
recall was itself not policy compliant. The fact that she has not done
this, nor has anyone else, indicates to me that Ward, at least, is
convinced of his interpretation and has acted consistently according to it
even when it would have been to his advantage not to - namely in getting
Bob Satti removed.

Cheers, Bob

--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-0613