PE> I am also concerned with efficient code, but I always use a profiler 
PE> first,
PE> and then attempt to keep it in C all the way.

RM> Bloody Borland don't seem to do a profiler any more. 

They do if you buy it separately.  And they do if you buy a copy of 3.1
instead of 4.0 (why do you need 4.0 - I don't).

RM> I miss it. Can
RM> you recommend a brand that still has one?

Borland have one, Watcom have one.  I'm not really in a position to
recommend a DOS C compiler, but I can tell you that I use Watcom for
consistency on my DOS + OS/2 platforms.  I don't like Borland for OS/2,
both because of the bugs, and because the debugger is PM-only.  Watcom
gives both.  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---