| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Baghdad in France? |
From: Ellen K. I don't know who the folks behind the matzpun site are, but the definitive facts are contained in the book "From Time Immemorial" by Joan Peters, ISBN 0-9636242-0-2. Review excerpts from major publications of all political stripes: Christian Century: "The most thoroughly researched and solidly documented work on the origins of the Arab-Jewish conflict . . . A book that smashes conventional wisdon . . . Unassailable in its thoroughness . . . It all makes a totally fresh impact." New York Times Book Review: "The massive research Ms. Peters did . . . would have daunted Hercules. In the course of it she turned up a great deal of interesting material from Ottoman records, the reports of Western consular officers and observant travelers and other sources." Washington Post Book World: "A remarkable document in itself. . . . The refugees are not the problem but the excuse." National Review: "Everything in this book reads like hard news. . . . One woman walks in and scoops them all. . . . The great service provided here by Mrs. Peters -- if only attention is paid -- is to lay a groundwork for peach by clearing away the farrago of lies. . . ." New Republic: "This book, if read, will change the mind of our generation. If understood, it could also affect the history of the future." Atlantic Monthly: "Fresh and powerful . . . Offers an original anlysis. . . . Makes it necessary for us to take a second look at, and perhaps even redraw, our picture of the conflict." Los Angeles Times: "The reader comes away not only rethinking the Middle East refugee problem, but also the extent to which propaganda can be swallowed whole for lack of information." Toronto Star: "With determination, brilliant detective work and patience, Peters managed to unearth a foundation of factuality, research and committment to truth." On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:15:28 -0500, "Rich Gauszka" wrote in message : >Really? You have a skewed definition of 'left of their own accord' > >http://www.matzpun.com/ > >In 1948 the state of Israel dispossessed the Palestinians, evicted hundreds >of thousands of them from their homes into refugee camps and did not allow >them to return when the war ended. The same state is now preventing the >victims of 1948 from having even the most basic services in their refugee >camps and remaining villages and towns. > >http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/israel-palestine/returnindex.htm > > In 1948 the UN General Assembly passed Resolution 194 on the Question of >Palestine, which "resolves that refugees wishing to return to their homes >and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the >earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the >property of those choosing not to return..." > >Today there are more than 3.7 million Palestinian refugees living in refugee >camps throughout the Middle East and many more exiles worldwide. Their right >of return is clearly and unambiguously guaranteed by international law under >the Geneva Conventions, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the >International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The refugees have a >claim to citizenship, financial settlement and, in some cases, return to >former homes and property in what is today Israel. The government of Israel, >however, opposes Palestian immigration, in order to maintain the Jewish >character of the state. Whatever the details of any future agreement, a >lasting and effective settlement must find a solution for Palestinian >refugees that recognizes and accommodates their "right of return" and their >claim to full citizenship in a state they can call home. > > >"Gary Britt" wrote in message >news:4395ee53{at}w3.nls.net... >> Palestinians weren't kicked out of Palestine. They left on their own >> accord >> thinking the Egyptian and Syrian armies would drive the Jews into the sea. >> When that didn't happen, they found themselves in a pickle created by >> their >> own choice for war and violence. >> >> Gary >> >> "Adam" <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near the bridge"> wrote >> in >> message news:4395397f$1{at}w3.nls.net... >>> Ellen K. wrote: >>> > On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 15:40:47 +0000, Adam >>> > <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near the bridge"> wrote in >>> > message : >>> > >>> > >>> >>>>Israel has free speech unless you speak to someone about another >>> >>>>religion. That's a free speech restriction based solely upon >> religious >>> >>>>beliefs being voted into law. >>> >>> >>> >>>Let's be honest here. There is no ban on "speaking to someone about >>> >>>another religion", for example in a course on comparative religions >> etc. >>> >>>Proselytization is not at all the same thing as "speaking to someone >>> >>>about another religion". Considering the Jews' history of being >>> >>>given >>> >>>the choice to convert or be killed, banning proselytization is >>> >>>completely logical and appropriate. It should be noted also that all >>> >>>religions are allowed to be freely practiced in Israel, unlike other >>> >>>middle Eastern countries like Saudi Arabia. >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>Or Lebanon? Or Egypt? Or Morrocco? >>> > >>> > >>> > In my neighborhood there are five Sephardic synagogues and ALL of them >>> > are Morroccan. I am told some 400,000 Jews lived in Morrocco a >>> > generation ago. There are about 2000 there now. Why do you think >>> > that >>> > might be? >>> > >>> >>> The mass expulsion of the Palestinians from Palestine? >>> >>> >>>>The religious Jews and orthodoxy in Israel >>> >>>>participate in parliament and the creation of the laws of Israel and >> are >>> >>>>deeply intertwined with the kind of laws made. So intertwined that I >> don't >>> >>>>think Israel can properly be called a secular state. >>> >>> >>> >>>The state is secular. The fact that people run for office on a >>> >>>religious platform and get elected, just means it's a democracy. >>> >>>People also run for office on other platforms and get elected. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>Who gets to decide who is a Jew & thus can live there in the first >> place? >>> > >>> > A person doesn't have to be Jewish to live in Israel, or to be a >>> > citizen, as I noted in my post to Gary. >>> > >>> >>> No, He can be born there as a non Jew. However to emigrate there, you >>> certainly can't be Arab let alone muslim. Whereas a Jew need only turn >>> up. >>> >>> Adam >> >> > --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.