| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Do we still need to prove God`s existence? |
From: Free Lunch On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:27:47 -0400, in alt.atheism stumper wrote in : >Free Lunch wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:38:00 -0400, in alt.atheism >> stumper wrote in >> : >>> Ray Fischer wrote: >>>> stumper wrote: >>>>> Free Lunch wrote: >>>>>> stumper wrote in >>>>>>> God is everything there ever was, is, will be, and some more. >>>>>>> Do we still need to prove God's existence? >>>>>> It appears that you have now defined "God" to mean "universe". What's >>>>>> the point? >>>>> And some more. >>>>> >>>>> Does the universe love you? >>>>> Does God love you? >>>> A man said to the universe: >>>> "Sir I exist!" >>>> "However," replied the universe, >>>> "The fact has not created in me >>>> A sense of obligation." >>>> -- Stephen Crane >>>> >>> >>> Too bad. >>> >>> God does so by definition. >> >> But not by observation. > > >Have you ever seen anyone >who lives in poverty to take care of others? Yes. This has nothing at all to do with any of your claims about gods. --- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38) SEEN-BY: 633/267 5030/786 @PATH: 261/38 123/500 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.