From: "Rich Gauszka" 

Actually I was wrong on the number of US troops involved in WW1 as 130,000
was the number we entered the war with. In 1918 almost 900,000 
participated in fighting between the Argonne forest and Meuse River



"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:439db695$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> There were probably less Germans as well.  Less British, less French.
>
> Gary
>
> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
> news:439db0ee$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Where are the terms of surrender recorded for Korea?
>>
>> There were less US troops involved in WW1 than currently in Iraq
>>
>>
>> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
>> news:439dafcd$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > Yes and except for WWII they were all won by Republicans.
>> >
>> > Gary
>> >
>> > "Robert Comer"
 wrote in message
>> > news:439daaa7{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> Lets see, WWI and WWII started with a democrat
presidents, as did the
>> > Korean
>> >> war, and I believe the Vietnam war escalated under a
democrat...  (and
>> >> that's just the ones off the top of my head.)
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Bob Comer
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Gary Britt" 
wrote in message
>> >> news:439d96b1$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> > The problem with the democraps is that nobody seems
to be an enemy
>> >> > or
>> >> > an
>> >> > enemy worth fighting.  There doesn't appear to be
anything they
>> >> > would
>> > ever
>> >> > deem worth protecting (except their personal short
term political
>> > power).
>> >> >
>> >> > Gary
>> >> >
>> >> > "Rich Gauszka" 
wrote in message
>> >> > news:439d932a{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> The problem is that everyone seems to be your
enemy these days
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Gary Britt"
 wrote in message
>> >> >> news:439d90de{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> > Victory.  Self Defense.  Deter aggression
by our enemies.  You
> know,
>> >> >> > all
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > stuff the democraps don't care about.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Gary
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "Rich Gauszka"
 wrote in message
>> >> >> > news:439d7ba6$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >> So in place of Murtha we currently have
someone who hid
>> >> >> >> somewhere
>> >> > around
>> >> >> >> Alabama for over a year during the Vietnam era?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> This invisible man of the 70s and his
appointed cronies placed
> the
>> >> >> > military
>> >> >> >> in the position they are now. Tell me
what their grand plan is
>> > again?
>> >> > Oh
>> >> >> >> yeah - stay the course - destabilize
the region, increase the
>> > national
>> >> >> > debt,
>> >> >> >> damage the national guard and ready
reserve ......
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> "Mark"
 wrote in message
>> >> > news:439d175e{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >> > Let's elect Murtha President and
CinC, then he can implement
> his
>> >> >> > wonderful
>> >> >> >> > plan based on his past experience
of operational control of
>> >> >> >> > our
>> >> > ground
>> >> >> >> > forces in Vietnam.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > As I've previously said, if the
generals that are actually on
> the
>> >> >> >> > ground
>> >> >> >> > prosecuting the war thought it was
such a great idea to cut,
> run,
>> >> >> >> > and
>> >> >> >> > observe from afar, they'd have
already done so  to
>> >> >> >> > a
>> >> > man,
>> >> >> >> > believes Murtha is the second
coming when it comes to military
>> >> > prowess
>> >> >> >> > that supercedes all others -- yea
right, please, give it a
> rest,
>> > and
>> >> >> >> > let
>> >> >> >> > him go back to relative obscurity
and serve out his remaining
>> >> >> >> > term
>> >> >> >> > in
>> >> >> >> > peace>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > "Rich Gauszka"
 wrote in message
>> >> >> >> > news:439d1366$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >> >> That's as logical as marching
in with no viable plan to exit
> and
>> >> >> >> >> believing Ahmed Chalabi that a
grateful population would
> flower
>> > us
>> >> >> >> >> with
>> >> >> >> >> gratitude and all would be
right with the world.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Here's a partial text of
Murtha's statement - full can be
> found
>> > at
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
http://bbsnews.net/article.php/20051118110122903
>> >> >> >> >> I believe before the Iraqi
elections, scheduled for mid
>> >> >> >> >> December,
>> >> > the
>> >> >> >> >> Iraqi people and the emerging
government must be put on
>> >> >> >> >> notice
>> > that
>> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> United States will immediately
redeploy. All of Iraq must
>> >> >> >> >> know
>> > that
>> >> >> > Iraq
>> >> >> >> >> is free. Free from United
States occupation. I believe this
> will
>> >> > send
>> >> >> >> >> a
>> >> >> >> >> signal to the Sunnis to join
the political process for the
> good
>> > of
>> >> >> >> >> a
>> >> >> >> >> "free" Iraq.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> My plan calls:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>  a.. To immediately redeploy
U.S. troops consistent with the
>> > safety
>> >> > of
>> >> >> >> >> U.S. forces.
>> >> >> >> >>  b.. To create a quick
reaction force in the region.
>> >> >> >> >>  c.. To create an over- the-
horizon presence of Marines.
>> >> >> >> >>  d.. To diplomatically pursue
security and stability in Iraq
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> "Mark"
 wrote in message
>> >> >> >> >> news:439d0feb$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >> >>> Not at all, the
oil-for-food program morphed out of the
>> > sanctions
>> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> you're right, we're always
wrong and we should Murtha on out
>> > right
>> >> >> >> >>> now
>> >> >> >> >>> and release Saddam back to
his palaces and atone for our
>> >> >> >> >>> sins --
>> >> >> >> >>> maybe
>> >> >> >> >>> the government will cancel
our free digital conversion boxes
> in
>> >> > favor
>> >> >> > of
>> >> >> >> >>> prayer rugs and special
Mecca compasses for all of us>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> "Rich Gauszka"
 wrote in message
>> >> >> >> >>> news:439d0d61$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >> >>>> Making up the rules of
the sanctions now?  The economic
>> > sanctions
>> >> >> > were
>> >> >> >> >>>> meant to force weapons
inspections and prevent Iraq from
>> >> >> >> >>>> acquiring
>> >> >> >> >>>> WMDs. Found any?
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> "Mark"
 wrote in message
>> >> >> >> >>>> news:439d09f0$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >> >>>>> The sanctions
worked just fine? Are you in total denial on
>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> the
>> >> >> >> >>>>> oil-for-food
mega-scandal?  Saddam
>> > was
>> >> >> > using
>> >> >> >> >>>>> that program to
corrupt the security council to maintain
>> > power?>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> "Rich
Gauszka"  wrote in message
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
news:439d0553$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Well there's
always the diabolical Iraqi sand fleas hid
> them
>> >> >> > excuse.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> < the
sanctions worked just fine >
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> "Gary
Britt"  wrote in message
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
news:439d0250$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Yes, and
you know this how?  How many WMD's have you
> looked
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> for
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> in
>> >> >> > a
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> land
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> area as
large as California, and that doesn't count the
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> land
>> >> > area
>> >> >> > in
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Syria
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> where they
may have gone and where you aren't allowed to
>> > look
>> >> > at
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> all.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Gary
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
"Robert Comer"  wrote in
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> message
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
news:439cf1ae{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >
They got the WMD well hid.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Dream
on. They would have been found by now.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Bob Comer
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
"Gary Britt"  wrote in
> message
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
news:439cc828{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >
They got the WMD well hid.  Democrap traitor and US
>> > senator
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > Warner went
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> to
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >
Syria and Saudi Arabia (at a time when he was the
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > head
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > of
>> >> > the
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > senate
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >
intelligence committee) and told Syria and Saudi
> Arabia
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >
(supporters of
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >
Hussein) that Bush was going to invade and they
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > should
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > prepare.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > Relying
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >
upon the advice of this well connected democrap
> traitor,
>> >> >> > convoys
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > of
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> trucks
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >
began moving lots of something into Syria during the
> few
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > months
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > before
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> the
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > invasion.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > Gary
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >
"Robert Comer"  wrote in
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > message
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >
news:439c7fb4{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> > Sanctions weren't working at all,
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> They just got rid of the WMD's and since that was
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> the
>> > aim
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> I
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> don't see
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> how
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> you could say they didn't work.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> --
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> Bob Comer
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> "Gary Britt"  wrote in
>> > message
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> news:439c41bb$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> > Sanctions weren't working at all, and had we not
> gone
>> > in
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> > the
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> > entirely
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> > corrupt and bought UN would have dissolved the
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> > sanctions.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> > Gary
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> > "Geo"  wrote in message
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
news:439bb28b$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> "Gary Britt" 
wrote in
>> >> > message
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> news:439b0ce0$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> > Iraq war was forced on us by Hussein's failure
> to
>> >> > comply
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> > with UN
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> > orders;
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> You mean to produce evidence that 50,000 gallons
> of
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> anthrax
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> had been
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> destroyed, the same 50,000 gallons that we still
>> > can't
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> find
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> even
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> after
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > 2
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> years of completely free run of the place?
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> Sanctions were working just fine, there was no
> need
>> > to
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> rush
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> in
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> before
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > the
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> > UN
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> got around to it.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> Geo.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5