| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Agora `bot` servers |
1237d51fa0c0 c_echo Hello Roy - CA>>> In countries where people pay for _all_ phone calls per CA>>> minute (even local) Agora can save some money. Being able CA>>> to download large files from a direct connect to a local CA>>> BBS is much more efficient than dealing with Internet CA>>> pauses and slow connects. RJT>> Fido was designed from the ground up with connection RJT>> efficiency in mind, as the primary thing, it appears. CA>> I wasn't referring to FIDO, just any BBS using any CA>> software. RJT> I would think that the same would apply to any bbs RJT> protocol. Agora isn't a protocol it's a 'bot'. CA>>> In the USA we get a certain number of local calls for CA>>> 'free' included with our base charge for just having a CA>>> telephone. Americans probably don't notice how long it CA>>> can take for a GUI browser to 'render' the display after CA>>> it has downloaded all the data required. RJT>> The hell I don't! I've got better things to do than sit RJT>> here waiting for somebody's idea of a good page to finish RJT>> loading. I was looking over a list of local business RJT>> links earlier this evening, and if a page doesn't come RJT>> completely up in a minute or so, I'm gone. CA>> The 'target' for HTML pages is supposed to be 23 seconds CA>> to load and display (or less). RJT> Oh? That's an interesting figure, where did you come RJT> across that info? I don't consider 23 seconds an RJT> unreasonable time to wait, though much longer than that RJT> and I start to get bothered by the delay. I know people who write websites for a living. :-) RJT> It's not the rendering of the page on my end, either, it's RJT> that it's not all here. RJT>> I expect this sort of thing is used to justify faster RJT>> connections, making the ISPs more money, but I like to be RJT>> able to take what I've got and use it efficiently. CA>> No, not really. There is no direct subsidy between those CA>> who put up websites and ISPs (usually). RJT> The sites in question, though, are _hosted_ by the ISP RJT> that I'm using. So any delays inherent in things is either RJT> a matter of the stuff used on the page or their setup with RJT> networking. Since I'm using an external modem and can RJT> watch the lights, I can see nontrivial amounts of time RJT> when there's nothing coming down the pipe at all. All people who attempt to write webpages are not created equal. RJT>> Besides that, the more I tie up my phone line with a RJT>> protocol that doesn't consider connect time, the less RJT>> chance that same phone line has to serve my bbs callers. CA>> Sounds like you need an Agora server. :-) RJT> I've not been ignoring your posts on the subject, even if RJT> I haven't otherwise commented much. :-) No problem. Seems there are more who talk Perl than actually understand what it can do. I'm about to drop the topic anyhow. > > , , > o/ Charles.Angelich \o , > __o/ > / > USA, MI < \ __\__ ___ * ATP/16bit 2.31 * ... DOS the Ghost in the Machine! http://www.undercoverdesign.com/dosghost/ --- Maximus/2 3.01* Origin: COMM Port OS/2 juge.com 204.89.247.1 (281) 980-9671 (1:106/2000) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.