RB>>> The "enhanced SDL " is actually the US/Canada
domestic code (1st Nov

RB>>> 95) that is doctored so that the Austel approved Courier
will take it.

RB>>> You just proved that the US code detects Australian Tones BETTER than

RB>>> the code INTENDED for Australia.



SA>>  The big question is.. Is there a US SDL and a Australian SDL *OR* are 

 DH> they



SA>> really only the one SDL with the Loader Bytes changed?.. 



 DH> According to Joe in the USR_MODEMS echo, there is now a new Australian 

 DH> 33.6

 DH> release - SDLPALLB..   Not yet seen, but
I'd expect him 

 DH> to be

 DH> passing out straight goods.



SDLPALLA has always been for european USR Couriers

Be interested to see this SDLPALLB.

The yanks are grouping us with Europe now.



SA>>  If they are different, why is Australia, Japan, etc Listed in a US SDL?



 DH> The original setup was common code with a delta.  Something's changed 

 DH> since,

 DH> specifically to disable our ability to run US code.



I've said all along, that you shouldn't have shot your mouth off about

being able to "enhance" the code....It was only time before someone

would wakeup.



Seems you messed in your own nest.



How about, We take all this USR Modem talk to the International USR_MODEMS

echo and see if this Aust_modem echo is better for it.

As most traffic here now is USR stuff and we are smoothering all the

"Made in Australia" stuff.





Russell



--- Terminate 4.00/Pro