From: "Gary Britt" 


"Bill Lucy"  wrote in message
news:MPG.1e0c140e43f266c989782{at}news.barkto.com...
> In article , email{at}from_Gary_Britt.org says...
> > His guy said Royal Dutch  was the best buy.  Your
> > guys said it was the worst buy.
>
> Not what he said at all. I don't even know if his
"institution" is going
> to buy RDS. I do know that John is correct regarding concerns over their
> reserves.
>

Here is the message you posted

In article , bobcomer_removeme{at}mindspring.com says...
.........

It seems that energy stocks are good buys these days. Exxon Mobile had a
>13% 3rd quarter increase (note: not annual, quarter). Chevron and BP
limped in at 13.6% and 19.8% respectively. Royal Dutch Shell is a strong
buy according to him.

............

Your guy says Royal Dutch Shell is a STRONG BUY; John's guy said its DON'T
BUY, basically.  Which as I stated in the post to John shows just how
valuable those BUY / SELL recommendations can be.  Now you jump in and
suddenly have discovered John was correct about the reserve stuff, but your
guy has them as STRONG BUY.

Other than showing how full of it you are, however, none of this has
anything to do with what I've posted as explained and summarized in my
posts to Robert Comer.  You don't ever address that because you obviously
don't know how.  Your subsequent posts have been diversions, off point, and
a reflection of the fact that you have learned a couple of things about
some specific trees in the stock valuation forest but are completely
clueless about how the stock market functions in its aggregate.  In other
words you not only don't see the forest you are unaware that there is even
a forest at all.

Gary

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5