On: 10 Oct 03  23:52:42 Bo Simonsen wrote to Roger Scudder:

 >  RS>  So tell me about the part of your Tic software that you want to 
 >  RS> write in C++.  Why do you think C++ would be a good choice?

 > It's written in C now, but I can't make of my mind if I shall use C++ for 
 > some of it.. Because it's not my oppinion that C++ applications is working 
 > far as good as C applications under Linux..

 I can't see why not.  It sounds like you may be splitting hairs over an
assumption...  now, are you going to tell me what this part you are
referring to is, or does?  ;-)

 >  >>  >> In someway I like Borland C++ too, maybe because
I'm forced to use 
 >  >>  >> it (They are only having that at my school).

 >  RS>  Seriously, though...  I used Turbo C++ for several years.  It was my 

 > It's not Turbo C++, it's Borland C++ (Windows based).

 I have used Borland C++ version 3.1 and it is very similar to Turbo C++
for DOS with the obvious difference being the Windows development tools.

-Roger
--- Spinone v0.1.79 Win32