From: "Gary Britt" 

No he's much more reserved and polite than I.

Gary

"Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
news:439b94b0$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Did Cheney tell you to spout those words of wisdom?
>
> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
> news:439b92ef$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >I didn't post a link, I gave the full quote.  There was a critique of
> > Inouye's logic and allegations.  Only neo-surrender monkeys caught with
> > their white flags around their ankles take offense and the civil
> > non-personal critique of the lies and crap being spewed by an old
> > political
> > hack.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
> > news:439b905f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> The link Gary posted attacked Inouye. I stand by my comments. The
neocons
> >> have this despicable habit of  attacking and questioning the patriotism
> > and
> >> courage of any veteran that questions their policies. They have this
> > history
> >> from McCain to Murtha to Inouye to ...... . Next they'll probably
propose
> >> internment camps for those who are disloyal enough to oppose their
> >> All-American policies
> >>
> >>
> >> "Mark"  wrote in message
> >> news:439b8b21$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> > The ad attacks Dean, Boxer, and Kerry -- they earned it
through their
> >> > ridiculous rhetoric and deserve it  > shut
> >> > up if they don't want the attention>
> >> >
> >> > "Rich Gauszka" 
wrote in message
> >> > news:439b85fa$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> >> Ah yes those that can't or are to chicken shit (
Cheney ) to try
> > attack
> >> >> yet another American hero. Why not just establish an
attack list of
> >> >> all
> >> >> those that hold the CMH.
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.medalofhonor.com/DanielInouye.htm
> >> >>
> >> >> DANIEL K. INOUYE
> >> >> Second Lieutenant Daniel K. Inouye distinguished himself by
> > extraordinary
> >> >> heroism in action on 21 April 1945, in the vicinity
of San Terenzo,
> >> >> Italy. While attacking a defended ridge guarding an
important road
> >> >> junction, Second Lieutenant Inouye skillfully
directed his platoon
> >> >> through a hail of automatic weapon and small arms
fire, in a swift
> >> >> enveloping movement that resulted in the capture of
an artillery and
> >> >> mortar post and brought his men to within 40 yards
of the hostile
> > force.
> >> >> Emplaced in bunkers and rock formations, the enemy halted the
advance
> >> >> with crossfire from three machine guns. With
complete disregard for
> >> >> his
> >> >> personal safety, Second Lieutenant Inouye crawled up
the treacherous
> >> >> slope to within five yards of the nearest machine
gun and hurled two
> >> >> grenades, destroying the emplacement. Before the enemy could
> >> >> retaliate,
> >> >> he stood up and neutralized a second machine gun
nest. Although
> >> >> wounded
> >> >> by a snipers bullet, he continued to engage other
hostile positions
at
> >> >> close range
> >> >>
> >> >> until an exploding grenade shattered his right arm.
Despite the
> >> >> intense
> >> >> pain, he refused evacuation and continued to direct
his platoon
until
> >> >> enemy resistance was broken and his men were again deployed in
> > defensive
> >> >> positions. In the attack, 25 enemy soldiers were
killed and eight
> > others
> >> >> captured. By his gallant, aggressive tactics and by
his indomitable
> >> >> leadership, Second Lieutenant Inouye enabled his
platoon to advance
> >> >> through formidable resistance, and was instrumental
in the capture
of
> > the
> >> >> ridge. Second Lieutenant Inouyes extraordinary
heroism and devotion
to
> >> >> duty are in keeping with the highest traditions of
military service
> >> >> and
> >> >> reflect great credit on him, his unit, and the
United States Army.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> "Gary Britt"
 wrote in message
> >> >> news:439b71aa$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> >>>
> >> >>> An analysis of Senator Inouye's statement
demanding President Bush
> > stop
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> RNC from showing the Democrap Neo-Surrender
Monkeys in their own
> > words:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> From Powerline Blog:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> This is really one of the dumbest statements
we've seen from the
> >> >>> Democrats
> >> >>> yet. Inouye says he "knows what it takes to
win a war." But the
> >> >>> Democrats
> >> >>> aren't talking about how to win in Iraq, they
are talking about
> >> >>> abandoning
> >> >>> the effort. That is to say, losing.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Inouye says the ad seeks to "distract the
American people from the
> >> >>> problems
> >> >>> in Iraq." Actually, of course, there is no
chance the American
people
> >> >>> will
> >> >>> forget that there are problems in Iraq, since
nearly every news
> >> >>> report
> >> >>> about
> >> >>> the country focuses exclusively on those
problems. What Inouye
wants
> > is
> >> >>> for
> >> >>> all the news to be bad all the time, and for the
Republicans to
> > refrain
> >> >>> from
> >> >>> pointing out that in fact, notwithstanding the
problems, we are not
> >> >>> losing
> >> >>> in Iraq. We are winning. It is not defeat in
Iraq the Democrats
fear,
> > it
> >> >>> is
> >> >>> victory. They are scared to death that it is
happening before their
> >> >>> eyes.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Finally, Inouye denounces the Republicans for
"playing politics" on
> >> >>> Iraq.
> >> >>> This is hilarious. The ad shows Democrats saying
that we have no
> > chance
> >> >>> to
> >> >>> win in Iraq and should pull out. How is it
"playing politics" to
let
> > the
> >> >>> American people know what the Democrats are
saying? Are the
Democrats
> >> >>> ashamed of their own words? And why isn't it
"playing politics"
when
> > the
> >> >>> Democrats launch one false, vicious attack after
another against
the
> >> >>> administration, but only when the administration
defends itself?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The truth is that the Democrats have never done
anything about Iraq
> >> >>> other
> >> >>> than to play politics. When they thought it was
to their political
> >> >>> advantage, they pretended to support the war.
The moment they
thought
> > it
> >> >>> was
> >> >>> to their political advantage to abandon our
soldiers' efforts,
that's
> >> >>> what
> >> >>> they advocated. They pretend that no progress is
being made in Iraq
> > when
> >> >>> they know that is not the case, and they try to
shout down anyone
who
> >> >>> disagrees with them. What is prompting the
present hysteria is that
> > they
> >> >>> are
> >> >>> afraid the Iraq issue isn't playing the way they
expected it to.
What
> > a
> >> >>> party! Two and a half years into a war, and
they're still trying to
> > keep
> >> >>> their options open.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5