From: "Gary Britt" 

Cheney doesn't want suggestions from an old political hack with a personal
axe to grind, who's entire plan is surrender now.

Gee, what a surprise that any person could possibly think an old political
hack calling for his country to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory
merely so his political party might gain power and money thereby, was a
stupid old fool.  Hey, he's no stupid old fool of a neo-surrender monkey,
he once served in the military several decades ago.

Gary

"Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
news:439b9671$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> It's more than that one powerline entry Mark. Looks at the recent attacks
on
> Murtha by Cheney until he saw it backfire on him. Now Cheney calls Murtha
a
> 'good man'
>
> Murtha isn't as impressed with Cheney though - Murtha on Cheney  "I like
> guys who've never been there that criticize us who've been there. I like
> that. I like guys who got five deferments and never been there and send
> people to war, and then don't like to hear suggestions about what needs to
> be done."
>
>
> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:439b942d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > Actually Rich, I find it totally amazing that a hero like Inouye is
> > defending the Deans, Boxers, and Kerrys of the world.  > of the Powerline entry as well, imho>
> >
> > "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
> > news:439b905f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> The link Gary posted attacked Inouye. I stand by my comments. The
neocons
> >> have this despicable habit of  attacking and questioning the patriotism
> >> and courage of any veteran that questions their policies. They have
this
> >> history from McCain to Murtha to Inouye to ...... . Next they'll
probably
> >> propose internment camps for those who are disloyal enough to oppose
> >> their All-American policies
> >>
> >>
> >> "Mark"  wrote in message
> >> news:439b8b21$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >>> The ad attacks Dean, Boxer, and Kerry -- they earned it
through their
> >>> ridiculous rhetoric and deserve it  >>> shut up if they don't want the attention>
> >>>
> >>> "Rich Gauszka" 
wrote in message
> >>> news:439b85fa$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >>>> Ah yes those that can't or are to chicken shit (
Cheney ) to try
> >>>> attack yet another American hero. Why not just
establish an attack
list
> >>>> of all those that hold the CMH.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.medalofhonor.com/DanielInouye.htm
> >>>>
> >>>> DANIEL K. INOUYE
> >>>> Second Lieutenant Daniel K. Inouye distinguished himself by
> >>>> extraordinary heroism in action on 21 April 1945, in
the vicinity of
> >>>> San Terenzo, Italy. While attacking a defended ridge
guarding an
> >>>> important road junction, Second Lieutenant Inouye
skillfully directed
> >>>> his platoon through a hail of automatic weapon and
small arms fire,
in
> >>>> a swift enveloping movement that resulted in the capture of an
> >>>> artillery and mortar post and brought his men to
within 40 yards of
the
> >>>> hostile force. Emplaced in bunkers and rock
formations, the enemy
> >>>> halted the advance with crossfire from three machine guns. With
> >>>> complete disregard for his personal safety, Second
Lieutenant Inouye
> >>>> crawled up the treacherous slope to within five yards
of the nearest
> >>>> machine gun and hurled two grenades, destroying the
emplacement.
Before
> >>>> the enemy could retaliate, he stood up and neutralized a second
machine
> >>>> gun nest. Although wounded by a snipers bullet, he continued to
engage
> >>>> other hostile positions at close range
> >>>>
> >>>> until an exploding grenade shattered his right arm. Despite the
intense
> >>>> pain, he refused evacuation and continued to direct
his platoon until
> >>>> enemy resistance was broken and his men were again deployed in
> >>>> defensive positions. In the attack, 25 enemy soldiers
were killed and
> >>>> eight others captured. By his gallant, aggressive
tactics and by his
> >>>> indomitable leadership, Second Lieutenant Inouye
enabled his platoon
to
> >>>> advance through formidable resistance, and was
instrumental in the
> >>>> capture of the ridge. Second Lieutenant Inouyes
extraordinary heroism
> >>>> and devotion to duty are in keeping with the highest
traditions of
> >>>> military service and reflect great credit on him, his
unit, and the
> >>>> United States Army.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> "Gary Britt"
 wrote in message
> >>>> news:439b71aa$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> An analysis of Senator Inouye's statement
demanding President Bush
> >>>>> stop the
> >>>>> RNC from showing the Democrap Neo-Surrender
Monkeys in their own
> >>>>> words:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From Powerline Blog:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is really one of the dumbest statements
we've seen from the
> >>>>> Democrats
> >>>>> yet. Inouye says he "knows what it takes to
win a war." But the
> >>>>> Democrats
> >>>>> aren't talking about how to win in Iraq, they are
talking about
> >>>>> abandoning
> >>>>> the effort. That is to say, losing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Inouye says the ad seeks to "distract the
American people from the
> >>>>> problems
> >>>>> in Iraq." Actually, of course, there is no
chance the American
people
> >>>>> will
> >>>>> forget that there are problems in Iraq, since
nearly every news
report
> >>>>> about
> >>>>> the country focuses exclusively on those
problems. What Inouye wants
> >>>>> is for
> >>>>> all the news to be bad all the time, and for the
Republicans to
> >>>>> refrain from
> >>>>> pointing out that in fact, notwithstanding the
problems, we are not
> >>>>> losing
> >>>>> in Iraq. We are winning. It is not defeat in Iraq
the Democrats
fear,
> >>>>> it is
> >>>>> victory. They are scared to death that it is
happening before their
> >>>>> eyes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Finally, Inouye denounces the Republicans for
"playing politics" on
> >>>>> Iraq.
> >>>>> This is hilarious. The ad shows Democrats saying
that we have no
> >>>>> chance to
> >>>>> win in Iraq and should pull out. How is it
"playing politics" to let
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> American people know what the Democrats are saying? Are the
Democrats
> >>>>> ashamed of their own words? And why isn't it
"playing politics" when
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> Democrats launch one false, vicious attack after
another against the
> >>>>> administration, but only when the administration
defends itself?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The truth is that the Democrats have never done
anything about Iraq
> >>>>> other
> >>>>> than to play politics. When they thought it was
to their political
> >>>>> advantage, they pretended to support the war. The
moment they
thought
> >>>>> it was
> >>>>> to their political advantage to abandon our
soldiers' efforts,
that's
> >>>>> what
> >>>>> they advocated. They pretend that no progress is
being made in Iraq
> >>>>> when
> >>>>> they know that is not the case, and they try to
shout down anyone
who
> >>>>> disagrees with them. What is prompting the
present hysteria is that
> >>>>> they are
> >>>>> afraid the Iraq issue isn't playing the way they
expected it to.
What
> >>>>> a
> >>>>> party! Two and a half years into a war, and
they're still trying to
> >>>>> keep
> >>>>> their options open.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5