From: "Gary Britt" 

I didn't post a link, I gave the full quote.  There was a critique of
Inouye's logic and allegations.  Only neo-surrender monkeys caught with
their white flags around their ankles take offense and the civil
non-personal critique of the lies and crap being spewed by an old political
hack.

Gary

"Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
news:439b905f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> The link Gary posted attacked Inouye. I stand by my comments. The neocons
> have this despicable habit of  attacking and questioning the patriotism
and
> courage of any veteran that questions their policies. They have this
history
> from McCain to Murtha to Inouye to ...... . Next they'll probably propose
> internment camps for those who are disloyal enough to oppose their
> All-American policies
>
>
> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:439b8b21$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > The ad attacks Dean, Boxer, and Kerry -- they earned it through their
> > ridiculous rhetoric and deserve it  > up if they don't want the attention>
> >
> > "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
> > news:439b85fa$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> Ah yes those that can't or are to chicken shit ( Cheney ) to try
attack
> >> yet another American hero. Why not just establish an attack list of all
> >> those that hold the CMH.
> >>
> >> http://www.medalofhonor.com/DanielInouye.htm
> >>
> >> DANIEL K. INOUYE
> >> Second Lieutenant Daniel K. Inouye distinguished himself by
extraordinary
> >> heroism in action on 21 April 1945, in the vicinity of San Terenzo,
> >> Italy. While attacking a defended ridge guarding an important road
> >> junction, Second Lieutenant Inouye skillfully directed his platoon
> >> through a hail of automatic weapon and small arms fire, in a swift
> >> enveloping movement that resulted in the capture of an artillery and
> >> mortar post and brought his men to within 40 yards of the hostile
force.
> >> Emplaced in bunkers and rock formations, the enemy halted the advance
> >> with crossfire from three machine guns. With complete disregard for his
> >> personal safety, Second Lieutenant Inouye crawled up the treacherous
> >> slope to within five yards of the nearest machine gun and hurled two
> >> grenades, destroying the emplacement. Before the enemy could retaliate,
> >> he stood up and neutralized a second machine gun nest. Although wounded
> >> by a snipers bullet, he continued to engage other hostile positions at
> >> close range
> >>
> >> until an exploding grenade shattered his right arm. Despite the intense
> >> pain, he refused evacuation and continued to direct his platoon until
> >> enemy resistance was broken and his men were again deployed in
defensive
> >> positions. In the attack, 25 enemy soldiers were killed and eight
others
> >> captured. By his gallant, aggressive tactics and by his indomitable
> >> leadership, Second Lieutenant Inouye enabled his platoon to advance
> >> through formidable resistance, and was instrumental in the capture of
the
> >> ridge. Second Lieutenant Inouyes extraordinary heroism and devotion to
> >> duty are in keeping with the highest traditions of military service and
> >> reflect great credit on him, his unit, and the United States Army.
> >>
> >>
> >> "Gary Britt" 
wrote in message
> >> news:439b71aa$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >>>
> >>> An analysis of Senator Inouye's statement demanding President Bush
stop
> >>> the
> >>> RNC from showing the Democrap Neo-Surrender Monkeys in their own
words:
> >>>
> >>> From Powerline Blog:
> >>>
> >>> This is really one of the dumbest statements we've seen from the
> >>> Democrats
> >>> yet. Inouye says he "knows what it takes to win a
war." But the
> >>> Democrats
> >>> aren't talking about how to win in Iraq, they are talking about
> >>> abandoning
> >>> the effort. That is to say, losing.
> >>>
> >>> Inouye says the ad seeks to "distract the American
people from the
> >>> problems
> >>> in Iraq." Actually, of course, there is no chance
the American people
> >>> will
> >>> forget that there are problems in Iraq, since nearly
every news report
> >>> about
> >>> the country focuses exclusively on those problems. What
Inouye wants
is
> >>> for
> >>> all the news to be bad all the time, and for the Republicans to
refrain
> >>> from
> >>> pointing out that in fact, notwithstanding the problems, we are not
> >>> losing
> >>> in Iraq. We are winning. It is not defeat in Iraq the
Democrats fear,
it
> >>> is
> >>> victory. They are scared to death that it is happening before their
> >>> eyes.
> >>>
> >>> Finally, Inouye denounces the Republicans for
"playing politics" on
> >>> Iraq.
> >>> This is hilarious. The ad shows Democrats saying that we have no
chance
> >>> to
> >>> win in Iraq and should pull out. How is it "playing
politics" to let
the
> >>> American people know what the Democrats are saying? Are
the Democrats
> >>> ashamed of their own words? And why isn't it
"playing politics" when
the
> >>> Democrats launch one false, vicious attack after another
against the
> >>> administration, but only when the administration defends itself?
> >>>
> >>> The truth is that the Democrats have never done anything about Iraq
> >>> other
> >>> than to play politics. When they thought it was to their political
> >>> advantage, they pretended to support the war. The moment
they thought
it
> >>> was
> >>> to their political advantage to abandon our soldiers'
efforts, that's
> >>> what
> >>> they advocated. They pretend that no progress is being made in Iraq
when
> >>> they know that is not the case, and they try to shout
down anyone who
> >>> disagrees with them. What is prompting the present hysteria is that
they
> >>> are
> >>> afraid the Iraq issue isn't playing the way they expected
it to. What
a
> >>> party! Two and a half years into a war, and they're still trying to
keep
> >>> their options open.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5