From: "Gary Britt" 

What Inouye did in 1945 has got nothing to do with his lies and bad
judgment today.  Just like Duke Cunningham's heroics in Vietnam have
nothing to do with his lies today.

The only ones doing the attacking are the democraps.  They have been
telling lies and making attacks non-stop for the past 13 months.  They
NEVER left campaign lie mode, and then they cry like stuck piggies when a
commercial comes out that has absolutely no audio EXCEPT the words of
democrats speaking.

It must be hurting them because they are squealing like neo-surrender
monkeys with their tits in a wringer.

Gary

"Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
news:439b85fa$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Ah yes those that can't or are to chicken shit ( Cheney ) to try  attack
yet
> another American hero. Why not just establish an attack list of all those
> that hold the CMH.
>
>  http://www.medalofhonor.com/DanielInouye.htm
>
> DANIEL K. INOUYE
> Second Lieutenant Daniel K. Inouye distinguished himself by extraordinary
> heroism in action on 21 April 1945, in the vicinity of San Terenzo, Italy.
> While attacking a defended ridge guarding an important road junction,
Second
> Lieutenant Inouye skillfully directed his platoon through a hail of
> automatic weapon and small arms fire, in a swift enveloping movement that
> resulted in the capture of an artillery and mortar post and brought his
men
> to within 40 yards of the hostile force. Emplaced in bunkers and rock
> formations, the enemy halted the advance with crossfire from three machine
> guns. With complete disregard for his personal safety, Second Lieutenant
> Inouye crawled up the treacherous slope to within five yards of the
nearest
> machine gun and hurled two grenades, destroying the emplacement. Before
the
> enemy could retaliate, he stood up and neutralized a second machine gun
> nest. Although wounded by a snipers bullet, he continued to engage other
> hostile positions at close range
>
> until an exploding grenade shattered his right arm. Despite the intense
> pain, he refused evacuation and continued to direct his platoon until
enemy
> resistance was broken and his men were again deployed in defensive
> positions. In the attack, 25 enemy soldiers were killed and eight others
> captured. By his gallant, aggressive tactics and by his indomitable
> leadership, Second Lieutenant Inouye enabled his platoon to advance
through
> formidable resistance, and was instrumental in the capture of the ridge.
> Second Lieutenant Inouyes extraordinary heroism and devotion to duty are
in
> keeping with the highest traditions of military service and reflect great
> credit on him, his unit, and the United States Army.
>
>
> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
> news:439b71aa$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >
> > An analysis of Senator Inouye's statement demanding President Bush stop
> > the
> > RNC from showing the Democrap Neo-Surrender Monkeys in their own words:
> >
> > From Powerline Blog:
> >
> > This is really one of the dumbest statements we've seen from the
Democrats
> > yet. Inouye says he "knows what it takes to win a war." But the
Democrats
> > aren't talking about how to win in Iraq, they are talking about
abandoning
> > the effort. That is to say, losing.
> >
> > Inouye says the ad seeks to "distract the American people from the
> > problems
> > in Iraq." Actually, of course, there is no chance the American people
will
> > forget that there are problems in Iraq, since nearly every news report
> > about
> > the country focuses exclusively on those problems. What Inouye wants is
> > for
> > all the news to be bad all the time, and for the Republicans to refrain
> > from
> > pointing out that in fact, notwithstanding the problems, we are not
losing
> > in Iraq. We are winning. It is not defeat in Iraq the Democrats fear, it
> > is
> > victory. They are scared to death that it is happening before their
eyes.
> >
> > Finally, Inouye denounces the Republicans for "playing
politics" on
Iraq.
> > This is hilarious. The ad shows Democrats saying that we have no chance
to
> > win in Iraq and should pull out. How is it "playing
politics" to let the
> > American people know what the Democrats are saying? Are the Democrats
> > ashamed of their own words? And why isn't it "playing
politics" when the
> > Democrats launch one false, vicious attack after another against the
> > administration, but only when the administration defends itself?
> >
> > The truth is that the Democrats have never done anything about Iraq
other
> > than to play politics. When they thought it was to their political
> > advantage, they pretended to support the war. The moment they thought it
> > was
> > to their political advantage to abandon our soldiers' efforts, that's
what
> > they advocated. They pretend that no progress is being made in Iraq when
> > they know that is not the case, and they try to shout down anyone who
> > disagrees with them. What is prompting the present hysteria is that they
> > are
> > afraid the Iraq issue isn't playing the way they expected it to. What a
> > party! Two and a half years into a war, and they're still trying to keep
> > their options open.
> >
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5