G'Day Paul,
 
-=> Quoting Paul Edwards to Frank Adam <=-
 PE> If you want to document that your program is broken, yes, that makes a
 
 FA> You mean i've got a "broken" copy of Msged ? 
 PE> You are correct, Msged is not a strictly conforming C 
 PE> program. It's miles from it in fact.  Try complaining about 
 PE> Tobruk instead.  Much less to complain about there!  BFN.  
I wasn't complaining..
I just don't agree with calling any program "broken" just because it's 
not confirming. There is nothing visibly wrong with Msged if it is 
compiled on the platform it was written for.  It is well documented
and the user has a "broken brain" if he tries and use it in the wrong OS.
Majority of the more powerful programs are the same, but far from 
being broken as long as they're used properly. 

  L8r Frank (fadam{at}ozemail.com.au).
  
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.21

--- Gash