From: Bob Stout 

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Jari Laaksonen wrote:

> Could it be possible to have Reply-To: c{at}snippets.org header
> in the mailing list messages? It would ease discussion a lot!

This has been the topic of a lot of debate. For two perspectives, see:

http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml>

Currently, reply-to munging isn't done and I'm prone not to do so. However,
this gateway is a special case and I may need to rethink it. I urge
everyone with an opinion to please read the preceding arguments, then
contact me *in private email* with your thoughts. Please do *not* argue
this in a list thread. Certainly most of the Fidonet community couldn't
care less, and truth be known, it's probably a non-issue to many on the
Internet side of things as well.

-------------------------------------------------------------
Consulting: http://www.MicroFirm.biz/ Web graphics development:
http://Image-Magicians.com/ Software archives:
http://snippets.snippets.org/
  c.snippets.org/   cpp.snippets.org/      java.snippets.org/
  d.snippets.org/   python.snippets.org/   perl.snippets.org/
  dos.snippets.org/ embedded.snippets.org/ apps.snippets.org/
Audio and loudspeaker design:
  http://LDSG.snippets.org/   http://www.diyspeakers.net/

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag-5