From: "codebreaker{at}bigsecret.com" 

On Mar 20, 7:19 pm, Free Lunch  wrote:
> On 20 Mar 2007 09:32:36 -0700, in alt.atheism
> Tohu.B...{at}hotmail.com wrote in
> :
>
>
>
> >On Mar 18, 11:56 pm, Free Lunch  wrote:
> >> On 18 Mar 2007 16:46:16 -0700, in alt.atheism
> >> "codebrea...{at}bigsecret.com"
 wrote in
> >> :
>
> >> >On Mar 18, 7:32 pm, Free Lunch  wrote:
> >> >>> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> >> It appears that you cannot support your view with
any evidence.- Hide
quoted text -
>
> >> >You must be intellectually LAZY. It is not for me to think for you
> >> >nor do your homework for you. I can only give you some clues
> >> >for you to do your research by thinking ASSHOLE
>
> >> The evidence you provide shows that you cannot support your views with
> >> any evidence and that you are unwilling to try. Insulting
people because
> >> they notice that you just make things up appears to be a major part of
> >> your methodology.
>
> >The information given by Paul in Corinthians, Galatians and Roman
> >on the Gospel is such clear that only an asshole will still
> >refuse to give it a thought and then requests a "ready- to
-swallow"
> >evidence
>
> You can make any false claim you like about what evidence is. Your lies
> will not change the meaning of the word, nor will it change the _fact_
> that no evidence supports your claims about gods.


So you think Paul was going from place to place with a Gospel of luke in
his pocket? Hmmmmm....
Then you will turn around and claimed that the Gospels were written 200
years later after Jesus death. It is refreshing to see that you people
 have reading comprehension problem.
The Gospel Paul claimed was written in the Jewish oracle. Epistle to the Romans
That could not be the Gospel of Luke.

He told the Galatians that some were preaching the Gospel of circumcision
which is far different from his Gospel. This could not be the Gospel
according to Luke He remined the Corinthians, the Gospel he preached to
them: "That Christ died for our sin according to the Jewish
Scriptures", wich is not the Gospel of Luke nor Matthew, In the face
of that truth you are stiill asking for evidence as If you couldn't read
or you can't comprehend what you read... You sound like someone who is
trying to impress others by tossing the word evidence around without
knowing its real implication. SIR,Evidence doesn't fall from the sky fully
fledged screaming, I am the evidence, I am the evidence. You are mistaken
If that is what you thought.




>
> >Do you think that evidence falls from the sky screaming
> >I am the evidence, I am the evidence? man your schooling
> >is left to be desired
>
> There is no evidence. Stop lying to yourself. I know you are lying, so
> repeating the lies won't make a difference to me.
>
> --
>
> "... There's glory for you."
>
> "I don't know what you mean by 'glory,'" Alice said.
>
> Humpty Dumpty smiles contemptuously. "Of course you don't--till
> I tell you. I meant 'there's a nice knock-down argument for you!'"
>
> "But glory doesn't mean "a nice knock-down argument,"
Alice objected.
>
> "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone,
> "it means just what I choose it to mean--neither more nor less."
>
> "The question is," said Alice "whether you can make words mean so
> many different things."
>
> "The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be
master--that's
> all."

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag