From: "Randy H" 

So much for your big inclusive tent canard.

"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:43a97404$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> They aren't republicans.
>
> Gary
>
> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
> news:43a9469c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>
>> "Phil Payne" 
wrote in message
>> news:43a93999{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/20/AR20051220006
85.html
>> >
>> > Has he seen the list?
>> >
>> > --
>> >  Phil Payne
>> >  http://www.isham-research.co.uk
>> >  +44 7833 654 800
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Plus 2 more Republicans jumped the Bush ship. Notice the White House
> double
>> speak regarding wiretaps ( the definition of anytime has changed )
>>
>> ----------------------------
>> Word of Robertson's resignation came as two Senate Republicans joined the
>> call for congressional investigations into the National Security Agency's
>> warrantless interception of telephone calls and e-mails to overseas
>> locations by U.S. citizens suspected of links to terrorist groups. They
>> questioned the legality of the operation and the extent to which the
>> White
>> House kept Congress informed.
>>
>> Sens. Chuck Hagel (Neb.) and Olympia J. Snowe (Maine) echoed concerns
> raised
>> by Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who
>> has promised hearings in the new year.
>>
>> At the White House, spokesman Scott McClellan was asked to explain why
> Bush
>> last year said, "Any time you hear the United States government talking
>> about wiretap, it requires -- a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing
> has
>> changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists,
> we're
>> talking about getting a court order before we do so."
McClellan said the
>> quote referred only to the USA Patriot Act.
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5