From: "Mark" 


"Monte Davis"  wrote in message
news:4kisq1l5u8bg871cc6o4mjm38moh1r392s{at}4ax.com...
> "Mark"  wrote:
>
>>if the NYTs keeps up their offensive... based on leaks
>>from (what should be and hopefully will be) criminals within the lower
>>echelons of government during war time...
>
> I'm confident your indignation extends to criminal leaks in higher
> echelons, say the office of the Vice President...
>
> Oh, it doesn't?

Yes it does as a matter of fact. Let's see, there's been an ongoing
investigation for a couple years now, so far some fellow named Scooter in
the VPs office has been indicted for leaking...

No, that's not it, he's been indicted for lying to the grand jury and
resigned his position. Also, a reporter spent a few months in jail and
resigned her position. I personally don't believe that mentioning a daily
Langley commuter was really an "outing," but that's what
investigations are there to determine.

> How surprising.

Not really, why would anyone be against investigating criminal leaks?
You're not against investigating, and subpoenaing if necessary, the NYTs
reporters to find out where they got their information about our ongoing
intelligence operations, are you?

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5