From: "Gary Britt" 

I basically agree with your comments here.

Gary

"Tony Williams"  wrote in message
news:43a9cd4a{at}w3.nls.net...
> Gary Britt wrote:
> > I'm I right that there wasn't going to be any ID or creationism
> > taught at all, and that what was objected to was a couple of
> > paragraphs that basically stated the theory of evolution was a theory
> > and might not be the correct explanation for the origins of life?
>
> It went a bit further than that:
>
> > Ninth-grade biology students were presented with a four-paragraph
> > which said that evolution was a theory, not a fact, and that there
> > were "gaps" in the theory.
>
> So far, so good - you can say that about most theories, although
> singling out evolution reveals an agenda IMO.
>
> However, the article then goes on to say:
>
> > The statement then invited students to consider other explanations of
> > the origins of life, including intelligent design.
>
> That's where they crossed the line (again, IMO) by pushing a religious
> belief in a science class.
>
> --
> Tony

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5