From: "Gary Britt" 

And what's the point?

Gary

"Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
news:43b03e34$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> We use/have used   napalm type weapons much more than any terrorists. Oh I
> forgot it's ok as we didn't sign the 1980 UN convention banning those
> weapons.
>
> 
>
>
> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
> news:43b03b9e{at}w3.nls.net...
> > We aren't discussing criminals killing criminals and police killing
> > criminals.  You're changing subjects.  We were discussing whether its a
> > war
> > or not, and it isn't a military war.
> >
> > Terrorists aren't using napalming because of some heartfelt ethical
> > concern
> > over that particular method of clearing a battlefield, so to make such a
> > statement reveals more about errors in your thinking versus us or the
> > terrorists.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> > news:43b036e6{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> > When they start napalming fields and people, then its a war.
> >>
> >> You'd be surprised how many are killed every year in the drug trade --
> >> I'd
> >> bet more than terrorism. Terrorists never napalmed anyone yet btw,
that's
> >> our specialty. :|
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bob Comer
> >>
> >>
> >> "Gary Britt" 
wrote in message
> >> news:43b0202e$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> > When they start napalming fields and people, then its a war.
> >> >
> >> > Gary
> >> >
> >> > "Robert Comer" 
wrote in message
> >> > news:43af989e$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> >> > The war on drugs isn't yet a military conflict.
 It remains a law
> >> >> > enforcement issue, so not the same as a real war.
> >> >>
> >> >> You do know that the military has been in on the war
on drugs, don't
> > you
> >> >> Gary?  The national guard has been active for many
years looking for
> >> > growing
> >> >> pot, not to mention the fighter jet scrambles for 
drug running
planes
> >> >> and
> >> >> the coast guard doing the same on the water...
> >> >>
> >> >> - Bob Comer
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> "Gary Britt"
 wrote in message
> >> >> news:43ae8245{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> >> > The war on drugs isn't yet a military conflict.
 It remains a law
> >> >> > enforcement issue, so not the same as a real war.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Gary
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Geo"  wrote in message
> > news:43ae4f98$2{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> >> >> does that make it ok to use the same
reasoning for the war on
> >> >> >> drugs?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Geo.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> "Gary Britt"
 wrote in message
> >> >> >> news:43ae3c2a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> >> >> > The war time threats we face make
things different.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Why surprised?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Gary
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > "Dave Ings"
 wrote in message
> >> >> >> news:43ae0c3c{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> >> >> > > Bush may be the President with a
capital P, but at the end of
> > the
> >> > day
> >> >> >> he's
> >> >> >> > > just a career politician, which
IMHO means he is more or less
> >> >> >> > untrustworthy
> >> >> >> > > and should have parental
supervision on sensitive matters.
You
> >> >> >> > > seem
> >> >> >> > > to
> >> >> >> > have
> >> >> >> > > a great amount of faith in him,
which all things considered
> >> > surprises
> >> >> > me
> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> > > bit.
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > And yes I would offer up the same
opinion of Clinton. A
little
> >> >> >> skepticism
> >> >> >> > > goes a long way, sunshine is the
best disinfectant, etc etc.
> >> >> >> > > --
> >> >> >> > > Regards,
> >> >> >> > > Dave Ings,
> >> >> >> > > Toronto, Canada
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > "Gary Britt"
 wrote in message
> >> >> >> > > news:43adffce$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> >> >> > > > As judge Posner said, the
President would be criminally
> >> >> >> > > > negligent
> >> >> > had
> >> >> >> he
> >> >> >> > > > NOT
> >> >> >> > > > instituted this surveillance.
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> > > > Gary
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5