From: "codebreaker{at}bigsecret.com" 

On Mar 20, 7:05 pm, Free Lunch  wrote:
> On 20 Mar 2007 16:56:19 -0700, in alt.atheism
> lorad...{at}cs.com wrote in
> :
>
>
>
> >On Mar 18, 3:21 pm, Free Lunch  wrote:
> >> On 18 Mar 2007 16:16:47 -0700, in alt.atheism
> >> "codebrea...{at}bigsecret.com"
 wrote in
> >> :
>
> >> >On Mar 18, 4:47 pm, "Mark K. Bilbo"
 wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:40:37 -0500, Free Gift wrote:
> >> >> > The Resurrection of Jesus
>
> >> >> Never happened.
>
> >> >Yet we have the Christ aka Messiah...
>
> >> We have assertions that Jesus was the Christ, the Messiah, but we have
> >> no evidence that this is the case.
>
> >> >This would not be possible without Jesus resurrection
>
> >> We have no evidence that there was a resurrection. We have claims from
> >> early writers.
>
> >It's a matter of faith.. you either have it or not.
> >You don't. period.
>
> I don't object to faith. I object when people falsely claim that their
> faith somehow qualifies as evidence.
>
> There is no evidence. That is the fact. Faith does not change that fact.
> If you claim otherwise, you need to provide evidence to show that there
> is evidence. Faith is not evidence, ever.

 Your ASS is not evidence either.... And you don't know how evidence
would work in this case so what is the point?

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag