Hyerdahl wrote:
> Masculist wrote:
>
> > "Carrel and Willard published their results in Nature this week.
> > Commenting on the findings, Chris Gunter, senior editor at Nature's
> > Washington office, compared women to calico cats."
>
> No, it did not.  What it DID say was about female abilities over male
> abilities in the XX vs XY scenerio.    Thus, if women were being
> compared to female cats, men would have to be compared to male cats,
> eh?
> >
> > In the LA Times article today the researcher said there were
greater
> > genetic differences between men and women than between men and
> > chimpanzees.   Watch the feminists come out of the woodwork on
this.
>  Their whole legal claim to mandated sexual equality is based on
little
> > or no sex differences.
>
> Not so.  The claim to legal equal rights is based on the fact that
> human beings are human beings, and the notion that one social group
has
> no right to be OVER the other, asshole. Here is one of the articles
ver
> batem and it does not say anything about  chimps.  :-)


Of course it didn't.  Thomas is part of the Irrelevant Crowd.  Lying
his ass off is the only way that he can push reaction buttons, anymore,
for his quota of attention.


Others of his cowardly bourgeois ilk have been dodging the Men's Issues
by glutting themselves on vicarious killing of socialists.

(Check out the link below to grasp the true motives carried by these
children of whores, in their tough little imaginary
"provider/protector" uniforms.  Another new low for
"our" American
Boys).


Tom, the cliched broken record, though, is still giving encores to an
empty audiotorium of taking stale sexist shots at the 1990s feminist.
"...DIS'LL get dose femwits' panties in a twist! ...huh-huh-huh ...me
funny. everybody mad at me!!"

.......what retards those guys all are.


http://www.ogrish.com/archives/dog_shooting_in_iraq_for_fun_Mar_16_2005.html


> Perhaps you're
> just off your nut.


Tom is one.



- - -

His wisdom is exceeded only by his courage to speak it:

Turin


I have such sites to show you...
------------------------
http://members.fortunecity.com/turinturambar/
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/Men_First/
------------------------

"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."

-----


> X Chromosome May Explain Difference Between Sexes
> By MALCOLM RITTER, AP
>
> (March 17)-- Women get more work out of hundreds of genes on the X
> chromosome than men do, and that might help explain biological
> differences between the sexes, a new study says.
>
> The results imply that women make higher doses of certain proteins
than
> men do, which might play out in gender differences in both normal
life
> and disease, researchers said.
>
> So far, however, none of the genes identified in the study has been
> linked to any such observable differences, said senior study author
> Huntington Willard of Duke University.
>
> He and Laura Carrel of Pennsylvania State University describe their
> analysis of the X chromosome genes in Thursday's issue of the journal
> Nature.
>
> A second paper in the same issue presents a comprehensive analysis of
> the chromosome's DNA, in which an international team of scientists
> found 1,098 genes.
>
> Chromosomes are the threadlike packages of genes and other DNA found
in
> cells of the body. People have 24 kinds, numbered 1 through 22 plus
the
> X chromosome and its runty partner, the Y. Women carry two copies of
> the X chromosome, one inherited from each parent, while men have one
X
> plus one Y chromosome.
>
> Long before birth, females permanently turn off one copy of their X
> chromosome in each cell, so that like males they operate with just
one
> copy functioning. The choice of which X chromosome is inactivated is
> random, an effect made visible in the unusual coats of calico cats.
>
> But scientists have long known that inactivation isn't perfect. Some
> genes on the inactivated copy continue to function, sending out
> chemical orders for the cell to manufacture specific proteins.
>
> The work by Willard and Carrel suggests the inactivated chromosome
> contains 200 to 300 such genes, in two categories.
>
> First, they found that 15 percent of the inactivated chromosome's
genes
> continue to function to some degree. More surprising, Willard said,
was
> what researchers discovered about another 10 percent of the genes.
For
> each, the activity level varied widely from one woman to the next,
from
> zero in some women to varying levels in others.
>
> That contrasts with the relatively consistent activity levels one
sees
> in X chromosomes from men, or in other chromosomes in either sex,
> Willard said.
>
> In fact, when the study compared the inactivated X chromosomes of 40
> women, each of them showed a different pattern of gene activity,
> Willard said.
>
> Dr. Jeannie T. Lee, who studies X chromosome inactivation at Harvard
> Medical School, said the study provides a better estimate than
> scientists had before of how many genes escape inactivation. And she
> agreed that the variability between women was a surprise.
>
> The work raises the possibility that varying activity of genes on the
X
> chromosome can account for not only some differences between the
sexes,
> but also between women, she said.
>
>
> 03/17/05 09:04 EST
>
> Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. The information contained in the
> AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
otherwise
> distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated
> Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/18/05 4:59:49 PM ---