From: stumper 

Syd wrote:
> On Mar 25, 10:39 am, stumper  wrote:
>> Syd wrote:
>>> On Mar 24, 9:32 pm, stumper  wrote:
>>>> Free Lunch wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 19:06:28 -0400, in alt.atheism
>>>>> stumper  wrote in
>>>>> :
>>>>>> Free Lunch wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:07:54 -0400, in alt.atheism
>>>>>>> stumper  wrote in
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> Jaime G wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article
,
>>>>>>>>>  stumper  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> How do you know that you are not
being deceived every time?
>>>>>>>>> If results are predictable, then one
is hardly being deceived.
>>>>>>>> What makes you think
>>>>>>>> the world has to be so regular and coherent?
>>>>>>> Observation shows that it is.
>>>>>> The other way around.
>>>>>> It cannot but appear that way
>>>>>> because we are assuming the physical world
>>>>>> to be regular and coherent to make it predictable.
>>>>> What? The observations are consistent.
>>>>>> There is no way to prove that
>>>>>> the physical world is actually that way everywhere.
>>>>> So what? Science isn't about proof, it's about evidence.
>>>>>> We already have some reasons to believe
>>>>>> that is not the case in quantum physics.
>>>>> But no other.
>>>>>> There is absolutely no reason to assume that
>>>>>> God should exist physically as well as spiritually.
>>>>> There is absolutely no evidence to support any claims
about any gods,
>>>>> even the one you are trying to sell.
>>>> Have you ever fallen in love with anyone?
>>>> --
>>>> ~Stumper
>>> "Ever fallen in love with someone, ever fallen in love
with someone,
>>> ever fallen in love with someone you shouldn't have.."
>>> PDW, who's guitar is in the shop..
>> God is everything there ever was, is, will be, and some more.
>> Do we still need to prove God's existence?
>>
>> --
>> ~Stumper
>
> "Jesus died for somebodie's sins, but not mine.."
>
> PDW
>

Do you believe in the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth?

--
~Stumper

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag