In article ,
 "Society"  wrote:

>    Want the explanation of the nice-guy vs. bad-boy
>    phenomenon? It isn't that women aren't attracted
>    to "nice guys" it's that we're not attracted to those
>    overly agreeable puppy dog kind of men. Be nice --
>    remember our birthdays, respect our parents,
>    be kind to fluffy woodland creatures -- but
>    remember that spineless isn't sexy.
> 
>    Mr. Nice Guy’s Mood-Killing Mistakes
>    by Laura Snyder
>    http://channels.netscape.com/ns/men/package.jsp?name=men/pm/moodkillingmist
>    akes/moodkillingmistakes
> 
> Hmmm.  What is "overly agreeable" supposed
> to mean to women like this Laura Snyder?
> 
>    If you find it inconceivable... check your premises.
>    You will find that one of them is wrong.
> 
>    Ayn Rand, _Atlas Shrugged_
> 
> When I was younger, I tried to act on the premise
> that women were rational creatures.  But so many
> women expressed wishes I found inconceivable
> in their number and magnitude of their mutual
> contradictions.

Out of thousands of wasted dollars and miles of 8mm film,
one neat scene did come out of the 90's sitcom
"Northern Exposure".  

A young men was asking an old man for advice after
Janine Turner played a mind game with him.  The old
man explained:

"Women aren't like us.  They have all this
right brain activity.  You know when you get mad
and can't think?  That's what they live in all the time!"

"So you mean they're in a constant rage?"

"Yes."

That lit a light bulb in my head and was a neat
explanation for a lot of things.  When I'm angry,
I "lose it" and don't have a capacity to listen
but all that adrenalin also allows me to be
aggressive and say a lot (usually it doesn't
make any sense but it does at the time.)  

Does any of this sound similar to a "parg" post?  

"...human beings defined their reality through misery and suffering." 
Human minds could not accept the program and therefore "...entire crops 
were lost."

regards,
Mark Sobolewski


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/18/05 4:59:46 PM ---