"The Natural Philosopher"  wrote

| You are an excellent example.  You argue for state oversight but you
| haven't thought it through.

   State oversight? Is that what you call it when we
have regulations banning DDT on peaches, arsenic
in vitamins, or faulty car parts made of junk metal?
Or maybe regulations stating obvious things, like that
TV makers and cable companies don't have a right to
record you through your TV set?
  I thought "civilization" might be a better description.


| The state can be bought and in fact it is.
| You really don't want to know who owns the Democrat party.
|

  And therefore we should throw out the baby and
even the bathroom with the bath water? There's no
sense in continuing to argue this same point if you
don't get it. You avoid specific issues to dismiss
everything as corruption and human stupidity. Smugness
as a drug.

  I don't think you want to get it. It's easier to smugly
point out corruption than to step up and represent decency.
But you do have that option. You could stop your hissing
accusations for a moment and just try to propagate
decency. Maybe start small. Help a hairdresser set up
her email, without telling her she's an idiot. Then you
could progress to doctors, lawyers and Indian chiefs. You
might find they're not all moprons simply because they
don't have an aptitude for computers. :)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05