From: Tom S 

On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 14:18:31 -0400, Attila  wrote:

>On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:36:19 -0400, Tom S  in
>alt.abortion with message-id
> wrote:
>
>>
>>>On 24 Mar 2007 09:58:32 -0700, "The Most Reverend Phelps"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mar 24, 12:49?pm, "LC"  wrote:
>>>>> "Al Klein"  wrote
in message
>>>>>
>>>>> news:1o2903pfgbo5r5oeaf6j89fkliqkgmbbor{at}4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> > On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:07:08 -0500,
"LC"  wrote:
>>>>> >>Just another fucktard hypocrite, "J
Young" 
wrote
>>>>> >>in messagenews:1174690060_4897{at}sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>>>>> >>> What ever became of the Constitutionally
protected rights to free
speech
>>>>> >>> and assembly?
>>>>> >>Exactly!
>>>>> >>Given your strong feelings on this, please
post your real name and
>>>>> >>address, so that subscribers to those 'froups
you annoy with your inane
>>>>> >>trolls will know where to exercise their
"Constitutionally protected
>>>>> >>rights to free speech and assembly".
>>>>> > Oh, no, he's a Christian.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, that's his trolling m.o., anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> > He gets to harass people, he's doesn't get to BE harassed.
>>>>>
>>>>> It would appear he _likes_ to be harrassed, given his
status as an
obsessive
>>>>> attention whore. It's his abject cowardice that
prevents him from
answering
>>>>> his challengers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ho hum...
>>>>
>>>>Abortion is wrong. The Lord has said, "You shall not
murder," (Exodus
>>>>20:13). The life that is growing within the mother is a
child, a baby.
>>>>The Bible looks at the life in the womb as a child.: Exodus 21:22
>>>>says, "And if men struggle with each other and strike
a woman with
>>>>child so that she has a miscarriage, yet there is no further injury,
>>>>he shall surely be fined as the woman's husband may demand
of him; and
>>>>he shall pay as the judges decide"
>>>
>>
>>I am sorry, but this tripe has been posted here so many times and
>>disproven so many times, that it is comical to see you posting it
>>again. But, considering the source......
>>
>>This Bible verse is not talking about an induced abortion, but is
>>clearly talking about an accidentally caused injury to the woman which
>>causes her to miscarry - spontaneously abort.  And do you want to tell
>>the people what the "fine" was that was customarily
demanded in this
>>case of misadventure?  It was usually along the lines of a lamb, kit,
>>or calf.  That is a pittance, even then.
>>
>>Tom S
>
>That appears to be that nut in Kansas - the one that is in an entire
>family of nuts.  He makes being a nut an occupation.

I know.  They are almost off the scale.  Fred and his family all need to be
committed.

I'm just surprised to see him back here.  He got pretty well beaten up the
last time he was here.  Maybe he thinks we are friendlier than the military
funerals he has been "picketing"

Tom S.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag