Philip Lewis wrote:
> http://www.angryharry.com/
>
> Comments by AH
>
> UK Law To Help Unmarried Women Fleece Their Partners Unmarried
partners who
> split up are likely to win new rights to make divorce-style claims
for
> financial support and a share of the other partner's property if
Labour is
> re-elected.
>
[http://politics.guardian.co.uk/homeaffairs/story/0,11026,1437071,00.html
]
>
> Yep: The UK government continues to make it harder for people to have
close
> relationships by making men even less secure in them; hence. more
> disharmony, more aggression, more violence, more breakups etc etc.
>
> Men must be treated as if they were married to their partners even
when they
> are not!
[...]

I saw this coming a long time ago, when stories started coming out
about men avoiding marriage.  As I predicted, the law is chasing men.
Women were using government to fleece men via marriage, so when men
started avoiding marriage, it was only a matter of time before
government went after unmarried men, on behalf of women of course.

No matter how we try to avoid it, women will have our money, as long as
they can use government to take it.  The only way to cut off this
robbery is to limit the size and scope of government.  But I digress.

Next, men will stop letting women move in, so the latest mechanism of
male-to-female wealth transfer will collapse.  Then they'll have to go
after men with girlfriends.  MPs will suggest laws whereby dumped
girlfriends can sue their ex-boyfriends.  Congress will soon follow.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/18/05 4:59:44 PM ---