From: Darrell Stec 

After serious contemplation, on or about Sunday 25 March 2007 2:13 pm
Patriot Games perhaps from Crazy_Bastard{at}Yahoo.com wrote:

> "Jeff North"  wrote in message
> news:0ovb039l18tiqolj21a7ao3lpilu2q8odl{at}4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:24:21 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality
>> "Patriot Games" 
>>  wrote:
>>>| "Dionisio"  wrote
in message
>>>| news:4604983c$0$24755$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com...
>>>| > Patriot Games wrote:
>>>| >> "Dionisio"  wrote:
>>>| >>>Patriot Games wrote:
>>>| >>>>Show where Lott committed incest....
>>>| >>>Such a "Christian" you are! Don't even
know the Bible?
>>>| >> Of course I know it...
>>>| > And yet you asked the question...
>>>| Because I KNEW Lott DIDN'T commit incest....
>> American Heritage New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition
>> incest
>> Sexual relations between relatives who are forbidden by law to marry;
>> for example, between father and daughter or mother and son.
>>>| I always prefer to have a liar out themselves by they themselves
>>>| posting that which traps them....
>
> He was unconscious.  Physically immobile.  He was raped.  He therefore
> didn't commit incest.  However, it was committed to him.


If he was inebriated enough to be unconscious, how did he get an erection? 
That part was a bit of scribal rewrite to eliminate embarrassment.  Either
he was conscious and knew what he was doing, or he was drunk and never had
an erection in the first place.  My vote is on the former

--
Later,
Darrell Stec      darstec{at}neo.rr.com

Webpage Sorcery
http://webpagesorcery.com
We Put the Magic in Your Webpages

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag