wrote in message
news:1111097846.224553.278590{at}o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Philip Lewis wrote:
>> http://www.angryharry.com/
>>
>> Comments by AH
>>
>> UK Law To Help Unmarried Women Fleece Their Partners Unmarried
> partners who
>> split up are likely to win new rights to make divorce-style claims
> for
>> financial support and a share of the other partner's property if
> Labour is
>> re-elected.
>>
> [http://politics.guardian.co.uk/homeaffairs/story/0,11026,1437071,00.html
> ]
>>
>> Yep: The UK government continues to make it harder for people to have
> close
>> relationships by making men even less secure in them; hence. more
>> disharmony, more aggression, more violence, more breakups etc etc.
>>
>> Men must be treated as if they were married to their partners even
> when they
>> are not!
> [...]
>
> I saw this coming a long time ago, when stories started coming out
> about men avoiding marriage.  As I predicted, the law is chasing men.
> Women were using government to fleece men via marriage, so when men
> started avoiding marriage, it was only a matter of time before
> government went after unmarried men, on behalf of women of course.
>
> No matter how we try to avoid it, women will have our money, as long as
> they can use government to take it.  The only way to cut off this
> robbery is to limit the size and scope of government.  But I digress.
>
> Next, men will stop letting women move in, so the latest mechanism of
> male-to-female wealth transfer will collapse.  Then they'll have to go
> after men with girlfriends.  MPs will suggest laws whereby dumped
> girlfriends can sue their ex-boyfriends.  Congress will soon follow.

Unfortunatley we have too many 'turkeys voting for christmas in the UK'. Why
ANY man would vote back in this (Labour)govt. riddled as it is with the
worst stripe of feminists is beyond my ken, yet, if the current polls are to
be believed they are about to do so again!!

Phil
>




--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/18/05 4:59:44 PM ---